Conditioned Placebo- and Nocebo-Like Effects in Adolescents: The Role of Conscious Awareness, Sensory Discrimination, and Executive Function
Options
BORIS DOI
Date of Publication
November 19, 2020
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute
Contributor
Weik, Ella | |
Tipper, Christine M. | |
Jensen, Karin | |
Oberlander, Tim F. |
Subject(s)
Series
Frontiers in psychiatry
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
1664-0640
Publisher
Frontiers
Language
English
Publisher DOI
Description
Background: Conditioning is a key mechanism of placebo and nocebo effects in adults.
Little is known about the underlying mechanisms of placebo and nocebo effects in youth
and how they might be influenced by conscious awareness and cognitive abilities. In this
study, the role of conditioning on thermal perception in youth was investigated.
Methods: Differences in thermal ratings were assessed in response to consciously
and non-consciously perceived cues that were conditioned to either low or high heat.
Furthermore, we tested whether executive function mediates the effect of conditioning
on thermal perception. Thirty-five high-school students (14–17 years) completed an
executive function task and underwent a sensory perception paradigm. In a conditioning
phase, two distinct neutral faces (conditioned cues) were coupled to either a low
or a high temperature stimulus delivered to participants’ forearms. In a testing
phase, the conditioned cues, and novel faces (non-conditioned control cues), were
paired with identical moderate thermal stimuli. In this testing phase, for half of the
participants cues were presented consciously (supraliminally) and for the other half
non-consciously (subliminally).
Results: We found a significant main effect of cue type on thermal ratings (p = 0.003)
in spite of identical heat being administered following all cues. Post-hoc analyses
indicated that the nocebo-like effect (conditioned high cue compared to control)
was significant (p = 0.027); the placebo-like effect (conditioned low cue compared
to control) was non-significant. No difference between cues presented supra- vs.
subliminally and no significant interaction effects were found. The association between
sensory discrimination and the magnitude of the nocebo-like effect was mediated by
executive function.
Conclusions: To our best knowledge, this is the first study establishing a relationship
between thermal perception, nocebo effects, and executive function in youth. Our
results may have important implications for understanding cognitive/ learning processes
involved in nocebo effects.
Little is known about the underlying mechanisms of placebo and nocebo effects in youth
and how they might be influenced by conscious awareness and cognitive abilities. In this
study, the role of conditioning on thermal perception in youth was investigated.
Methods: Differences in thermal ratings were assessed in response to consciously
and non-consciously perceived cues that were conditioned to either low or high heat.
Furthermore, we tested whether executive function mediates the effect of conditioning
on thermal perception. Thirty-five high-school students (14–17 years) completed an
executive function task and underwent a sensory perception paradigm. In a conditioning
phase, two distinct neutral faces (conditioned cues) were coupled to either a low
or a high temperature stimulus delivered to participants’ forearms. In a testing
phase, the conditioned cues, and novel faces (non-conditioned control cues), were
paired with identical moderate thermal stimuli. In this testing phase, for half of the
participants cues were presented consciously (supraliminally) and for the other half
non-consciously (subliminally).
Results: We found a significant main effect of cue type on thermal ratings (p = 0.003)
in spite of identical heat being administered following all cues. Post-hoc analyses
indicated that the nocebo-like effect (conditioned high cue compared to control)
was significant (p = 0.027); the placebo-like effect (conditioned low cue compared
to control) was non-significant. No difference between cues presented supra- vs.
subliminally and no significant interaction effects were found. The association between
sensory discrimination and the magnitude of the nocebo-like effect was mediated by
executive function.
Conclusions: To our best knowledge, this is the first study establishing a relationship
between thermal perception, nocebo effects, and executive function in youth. Our
results may have important implications for understanding cognitive/ learning processes
involved in nocebo effects.
File(s)
| File | File Type | Format | Size | License | Publisher/Copright statement | Content | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neuenschwander et al. (2020).pdf | Adobe PDF | 873.49 KB | Attribution (CC BY 4.0) | published |