• LOGIN
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publication
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • LOGIN
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Artificial intelligence in resuscitation: a scoping review.
 

Artificial intelligence in resuscitation: a scoping review.

Options
  • Details
BORIS DOI
10.48620/88603
Date of Publication
July 2025
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute

Faculty of Medicine

Author
Zace, Drieda
Semeraro, Federico
Schnaubelt, Sebastian
Montomoli, Jonathan
Ristagno, Giuseppe
Fijačko, Nino
Gamberini, Lorenzo
Bignami, Elena G
Greif, Robertorcid-logo
Faculty of Medicine
Monsieurs, Koenraad G
Scapigliati, Andrea
Series
Resuscitation Plus
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
2666-5204
Publisher
Elsevier
Language
English
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100973
PubMed ID
40486106
Uncontrolled Keywords

Artificial intelligen...

Cardiac arrest

Deep learning

Large language model

Machine learning

Resuscitation

Scoping review

Description
Background
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied in medicine, with growing interest in its potential to improve outcomes in cardiac arrest (CA). However, the scope and characteristics of current AI applications in resuscitation remain unclear.

Methods
This scoping review aims to map the existing literature on AI applications in CA and resuscitation and identify research gaps for further investigation. PRISMA-ScR framework and ILCOR guidelines were followed. A systematic literature search across PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane identified AI applications in resuscitation. Articles were screened and classified by AI methodology, study design, outcomes, and implementation settings. AI-assisted data extraction was manually validated for accuracy.

Results
Out of 4046 records, 197 studies met inclusion criteria. Most were retrospective (90%), with only 16 prospective studies and 2 randomised controlled trials. AI was predominantly applied in prediction of CA, rhythm classification, and post-resuscitation outcome prognostication. Machine learning was the most commonly used method (50% of studies), followed by deep learning and, less frequently, natural language processing. Reported performance was generally high, with AUROC values often exceeding 0.85; however, external validation was rare and real-world implementation limited.

Conclusions
While AI applications in resuscitation demonstrate encouraging performance in prediction and decision support tasks, clear evidence of improved patient outcomes or routine clinical use remains limited. Future research should focus on prospective validation, equity in data sources, explainability, and seamless integration of AI tools into clinical workflows.
Handle
https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/211784
Show full item
File(s)
FileFile TypeFormatSizeLicensePublisher/Copright statementContent
1-s2.0-S2666520425001109-main.pdftextAdobe PDF1.33 MBAttribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0)publishedOpen
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: d1c7f7 [27.06. 13:56]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo