Publication:
Artificial intelligence in resuscitation: a scoping review.

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0003-0160-2073
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid3e5f9518-08b5-4b2c-8b0f-3b03d7aad0bb
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorZace, Drieda
dc.contributor.authorSemeraro, Federico
dc.contributor.authorSchnaubelt, Sebastian
dc.contributor.authorMontomoli, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorRistagno, Giuseppe
dc.contributor.authorFijačko, Nino
dc.contributor.authorGamberini, Lorenzo
dc.contributor.authorBignami, Elena G
dc.contributor.authorGreif, Robert
dc.contributor.authorMonsieurs, Koenraad G
dc.contributor.authorScapigliati, Andrea
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-19T09:04:27Z
dc.date.available2025-06-19T09:04:27Z
dc.date.issued2025-07
dc.description.abstractBackground Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly applied in medicine, with growing interest in its potential to improve outcomes in cardiac arrest (CA). However, the scope and characteristics of current AI applications in resuscitation remain unclear. Methods This scoping review aims to map the existing literature on AI applications in CA and resuscitation and identify research gaps for further investigation. PRISMA-ScR framework and ILCOR guidelines were followed. A systematic literature search across PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane identified AI applications in resuscitation. Articles were screened and classified by AI methodology, study design, outcomes, and implementation settings. AI-assisted data extraction was manually validated for accuracy. Results Out of 4046 records, 197 studies met inclusion criteria. Most were retrospective (90%), with only 16 prospective studies and 2 randomised controlled trials. AI was predominantly applied in prediction of CA, rhythm classification, and post-resuscitation outcome prognostication. Machine learning was the most commonly used method (50% of studies), followed by deep learning and, less frequently, natural language processing. Reported performance was generally high, with AUROC values often exceeding 0.85; however, external validation was rare and real-world implementation limited. Conclusions While AI applications in resuscitation demonstrate encouraging performance in prediction and decision support tasks, clear evidence of improved patient outcomes or routine clinical use remains limited. Future research should focus on prospective validation, equity in data sources, explainability, and seamless integration of AI tools into clinical workflows.
dc.description.sponsorshipFaculty of Medicine
dc.identifier.doi10.48620/88603
dc.identifier.pmid40486106
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100973
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/211784
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofResuscitation Plus
dc.relation.issn2666-5204
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence
dc.subjectCardiac arrest
dc.subjectDeep learning
dc.subjectLarge language model
dc.subjectMachine learning
dc.subjectResuscitation
dc.subjectScoping review
dc.titleArtificial intelligence in resuscitation: a scoping review.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.volume24
oairecerif.author.affiliationFaculty of Medicine
unibe.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0160-2073
unibe.contributor.roleauthor
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlereview

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
1-s2.0-S2666520425001109-main.pdf
Size:
1.33 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
Content:
published

Collections