• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of an Aerosolized Vaccine against Measles.
 

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of an Aerosolized Vaccine against Measles.

Options
  • Details
BORIS DOI
10.7892/boris.67999
Date of Publication
April 16, 2015
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute

Institut für Sozial- ...

Contributor
Low, Nicolaorcid-logo
Institut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
Bavdekar, Ashish
Jeyaseelan, Lakshmanan
Hirve, Siddhivinayak
Ramanathan, Kavitha
Andrews, Nicholas J
Shaikh, Naseem
Jadi, Ramesh S
Rajagopal, Arunachalam
Brown, Kevin E
Brown, David
Fink, James B
John, Oommen
Scott, Pippa
Institut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
Riveros-Balta, A Ximena
Greco, Michel
Dhere, Rajeev
Kulkarni, Prasad S
Henao Restrepo, Ana Maria
Subject(s)

600 - Technology::610...

300 - Social sciences...

Series
New England journal of medicine NEJM
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
0028-4793
Publisher
Massachusetts Medical Society MMS
Language
English
Publisher DOI
10.1056/NEJMoa1407417
PubMed ID
25875257
Description
Background Aerosolized vaccine can be used as a needle-free method of immunization against measles, a disease that remains a major cause of illness and death. Data on the immunogenicity of aerosolized vaccine against measles in children are inconsistent. Methods We conducted an open-label noninferiority trial involving children 9.0 to 11.9 months of age in India who were eligible to receive a first dose of measles vaccine. Children were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of vaccine by means of either aerosol inhalation or a subcutaneous injection. The primary end points were seropositivity for antibodies against measles and adverse events 91 days after vaccination. The noninferiority margin was 5 percentage points. Results A total of 1001 children were assigned to receive aerosolized vaccine, and 1003 children were assigned to receive subcutaneous vaccine; 1956 of all the children (97.6%) were followed to day 91, but outcome data were missing for 331 children because of thawed specimens. In the per-protocol population, data on 1560 of 2004 children (77.8%) could be evaluated. At day 91, a total of 662 of 775 children (85.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 82.5 to 88.0) in the aerosol group, as compared with 743 of 785 children (94.6%; 95% CI, 92.7 to 96.1) in the subcutaneous group, were seropositive, a difference of -9.2 percentage points (95% CI, -12.2 to -6.3). Findings were similar in the full-analysis set (673 of 788 children in the aerosol group [85.4%] and 754 of 796 children in the subcutaneous group [94.7%] were seropositive at day 91, a difference of -9.3 percentage points [95% CI, -12.3 to -6.4]) and after multiple imputation of missing results. No serious adverse events were attributable to measles vaccination. Adverse-event profiles were similar in the two groups. Conclusions Aerosolized vaccine against measles was immunogenic, but, at the prespecified margin, the aerosolized vaccine was inferior to the subcutaneous vaccine with respect to the rate of seropositivity. (Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Measles Aerosol Vaccine Project Clinical Trials Registry-India number, CTRI/2009/091/000673 .).
Handle
https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/132778
Show full item
File(s)
FileFile TypeFormatSizeLicensePublisher/Copright statementContent
Low NEnglJMed 2015.pdftextAdobe PDF529.53 KBpublisherpublishedOpen
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 960e9e [21.08. 13:49]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo