Publication:
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of an Aerosolized Vaccine against Measles.

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0003-4817-8986
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidbb5e3f47-d3b5-4015-aac8-1c096b001132
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid2181c238-ae41-4011-bc1a-062795b8bc5a
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorLow, Nicola
dc.contributor.authorBavdekar, Ashish
dc.contributor.authorJeyaseelan, Lakshmanan
dc.contributor.authorHirve, Siddhivinayak
dc.contributor.authorRamanathan, Kavitha
dc.contributor.authorAndrews, Nicholas J
dc.contributor.authorShaikh, Naseem
dc.contributor.authorJadi, Ramesh S
dc.contributor.authorRajagopal, Arunachalam
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Kevin E
dc.contributor.authorBrown, David
dc.contributor.authorFink, James B
dc.contributor.authorJohn, Oommen
dc.contributor.authorScott, Pippa
dc.contributor.authorRiveros-Balta, A Ximena
dc.contributor.authorGreco, Michel
dc.contributor.authorDhere, Rajeev
dc.contributor.authorKulkarni, Prasad S
dc.contributor.authorHenao Restrepo, Ana Maria
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-23T18:20:42Z
dc.date.available2024-10-23T18:20:42Z
dc.date.issued2015-04-16
dc.description.abstractBackground Aerosolized vaccine can be used as a needle-free method of immunization against measles, a disease that remains a major cause of illness and death. Data on the immunogenicity of aerosolized vaccine against measles in children are inconsistent. Methods We conducted an open-label noninferiority trial involving children 9.0 to 11.9 months of age in India who were eligible to receive a first dose of measles vaccine. Children were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of vaccine by means of either aerosol inhalation or a subcutaneous injection. The primary end points were seropositivity for antibodies against measles and adverse events 91 days after vaccination. The noninferiority margin was 5 percentage points. Results A total of 1001 children were assigned to receive aerosolized vaccine, and 1003 children were assigned to receive subcutaneous vaccine; 1956 of all the children (97.6%) were followed to day 91, but outcome data were missing for 331 children because of thawed specimens. In the per-protocol population, data on 1560 of 2004 children (77.8%) could be evaluated. At day 91, a total of 662 of 775 children (85.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 82.5 to 88.0) in the aerosol group, as compared with 743 of 785 children (94.6%; 95% CI, 92.7 to 96.1) in the subcutaneous group, were seropositive, a difference of -9.2 percentage points (95% CI, -12.2 to -6.3). Findings were similar in the full-analysis set (673 of 788 children in the aerosol group [85.4%] and 754 of 796 children in the subcutaneous group [94.7%] were seropositive at day 91, a difference of -9.3 percentage points [95% CI, -12.3 to -6.4]) and after multiple imputation of missing results. No serious adverse events were attributable to measles vaccination. Adverse-event profiles were similar in the two groups. Conclusions Aerosolized vaccine against measles was immunogenic, but, at the prespecified margin, the aerosolized vaccine was inferior to the subcutaneous vaccine with respect to the rate of seropositivity. (Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Measles Aerosol Vaccine Project Clinical Trials Registry-India number, CTRI/2009/091/000673 .).
dc.description.numberOfPages11
dc.description.sponsorshipInstitut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
dc.identifier.doi10.7892/boris.67999
dc.identifier.pmid25875257
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1056/NEJMoa1407417
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/132778
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMassachusetts Medical Society MMS
dc.relation.ispartofNew England journal of medicine NEJM
dc.relation.issn0028-4793
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BECFE17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.subject.ddc300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology::360 - Social problems & social services
dc.titleA Randomized, Controlled Trial of an Aerosolized Vaccine against Measles.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.endPage1529
oaire.citation.issue16
oaire.citation.startPage1519
oaire.citation.volume372
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2017-09-13 00:30:30
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId67999
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleNew Engl J Med
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
Low NEnglJMed 2015.pdf
Size:
529.53 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
publisher
Content:
published

Collections