A randomized trial of effects of health risk appraisal combined with group sessions or home visits on preventive behaviors in older adults
Options
BORIS DOI
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
21350242
Description
Background. To explore effects of a health risk appraisal for older people (HRA-O) program with reinforcement, we conducted a randomized controlled trial in 21 general practices in Hamburg, Germany.
Methods. Overall, 2,580 older patients of 14 general practitioners trained in reinforcing recommendations related to HRA-O-identified risk factors were randomized into intervention (n = 878) and control (n = 1,702) groups. Patients (n = 746) of seven additional matched general practitioners who did not receive this training served as a comparison group. Patients allocated to the intervention group, and their general practitioners, received computer-tailored written recommendations, and patients were offered the choice between interdisciplinary group sessions (geriatrician, physiotherapist, social worker, and nutritionist) and home visits (nurse).
Results. Among the intervention group, 580 (66%) persons made use of personal reinforcement (group sessions: 503 [87%], home visits: 77 [13%]). At 1-year follow-up, persons in the intervention group had higher use of preventive services (eg, influenza vaccinations, adjusted odds ratio 1.7; 95% confidence interval 1.4–2.1) and more favorable health behavior (eg, high fruit/fiber intake, odds ratio 2.0; 95% confidence interval 1.6–2.6), as compared with controls. Comparisons between intervention and comparison group data revealed similar effects, suggesting that physician training alone had no effect. Subgroup analyses indicated favorable effects for HRA-O with personal reinforcement, but not for HRA-O without reinforcement.
Conclusions. HRA-O combined with physician training and personal reinforcement had favorable effects on preventive care use and health behavior.
Methods. Overall, 2,580 older patients of 14 general practitioners trained in reinforcing recommendations related to HRA-O-identified risk factors were randomized into intervention (n = 878) and control (n = 1,702) groups. Patients (n = 746) of seven additional matched general practitioners who did not receive this training served as a comparison group. Patients allocated to the intervention group, and their general practitioners, received computer-tailored written recommendations, and patients were offered the choice between interdisciplinary group sessions (geriatrician, physiotherapist, social worker, and nutritionist) and home visits (nurse).
Results. Among the intervention group, 580 (66%) persons made use of personal reinforcement (group sessions: 503 [87%], home visits: 77 [13%]). At 1-year follow-up, persons in the intervention group had higher use of preventive services (eg, influenza vaccinations, adjusted odds ratio 1.7; 95% confidence interval 1.4–2.1) and more favorable health behavior (eg, high fruit/fiber intake, odds ratio 2.0; 95% confidence interval 1.6–2.6), as compared with controls. Comparisons between intervention and comparison group data revealed similar effects, suggesting that physician training alone had no effect. Subgroup analyses indicated favorable effects for HRA-O with personal reinforcement, but not for HRA-O without reinforcement.
Conclusions. HRA-O combined with physician training and personal reinforcement had favorable effects on preventive care use and health behavior.
Date of Publication
2011
Publication Type
Article
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Dapp, Ulrike | |
Anders, Jennifer A M | |
von Renteln-Kruse, Wolfgang | |
Minder, Christoph E | |
Meier-Baumgartner, Hans Peter | |
Swift Cameron, G |
Additional Credits
Geriatrische Universitätsklinik, Geriatrie Spital Netz Bern
Institut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
Universitätsklinik für Neurochirurgie
Series
Journals of gerontology. Series A - biological sciences and medical sciences
Publisher
Oxford University Press
ISSN
1079-5006
Access(Rights)
open.access