• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Do fish get wasted? Assessing the influence of effluents on parasitic infection of wild fish.
 

Do fish get wasted? Assessing the influence of effluents on parasitic infection of wild fish.

Options
  • Details
BORIS DOI
10.7892/boris.129638
Date of Publication
November 13, 2018
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute

Zentrum für Fisch- un...

Contributor
Bailey, Christyn John
Zentrum für Fisch- und Wildtiermedizin (FIWI)
Rubin, Aurélie
Strepparava, Nicole
Zentrum für Fisch- und Wildtiermedizin (FIWI)
Segner, Helmut
Zentrum für Fisch- und Wildtiermedizin (FIWI)
Rubin, Jean-François
Wahli, Thomas
Zentrum für Fisch- und Wildtiermedizin (FIWI)
Subject(s)

600 - Technology::630...

500 - Science::570 - ...

Series
PeerJ
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
2167-8359
Publisher
PeerJ, Ltd
Language
English
Publisher DOI
10.7717/peerj.5956
PubMed ID
30479904
Uncontrolled Keywords

Aquatic pollution Hos...

Description
Many ecosystems are influenced simultaneously by multiple stressors. One important environmental stressor is aquatic pollution via wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluents. WWTP effluents may contribute to eutrophication or contain anthropogenic contaminants that directly and/or indirectly influence aquatic wildlife. Both eutrophication and exposure to anthropogenic contaminants may affect the dynamics of fish-parasite systems. With this in mind, we studied the impact of WWTP effluents on infection of brown trout by the parasite , the causative agent of proliferative kidney disease (PKD). PKD is associated with the long-term decline of wild brown trout () populations in Switzerland. We investigated PKD infection of brown trout at two adjacent sites (≈400 m apart) of a Swiss river. The sites are similar in terms of ecology except that one site receives WWTP effluents. We evaluated the hypothesis that fish inhabiting the effluent site will show greater susceptibility to PKD in terms of prevalence and disease outcome. We assessed susceptibility by (i) infection prevalence, (ii) parasite intensity, (iii) host health in terms of pathology, and (iv) estimated apparent survival rate. At different time points during the study, significant differences between sites concerning all measured parameters were found, thus providing evidence of the influence of effluents on parasitic infection of fish in our study system. However, from these findings we cannot determine if the effluent has a direct influence on the fish host via altering its ability to manage the parasite, or indirectly on the parasite or the invertebrate host via increasing bryozoa (the invertebrate host) reproduction. On a final note, the WWTP adhered to all national guidelines and the effluent only resulted in a minor water quality reduction assessed via standardized methods in this study. Thus, we provide evidence that even a subtle decrease in water quality, resulting in small-scale pollution can have consequences for wildlife.
Handle
https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/66082
Show full item
File(s)
FileFile TypeFormatSizeLicensePublisher/Copright statementContent
peerj-5956.pdftextAdobe PDF11.91 MBpublishedOpen
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 960e9e [21.08. 13:49]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo