• LOGIN
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publication
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • LOGIN
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Large Scale Land Acquisition as Commons Grabbing: A comparative study on cases from Africa
 

Large Scale Land Acquisition as Commons Grabbing: A comparative study on cases from Africa

Options
  • Details
Date of Publication
June 2019
Publication Type
Book Section
Division/Institute

Institut für Sozialan...

Geographisches Instit...

Geographisches Instit...

Author
Haller, Tobias
Institut für Sozialanthropologie
Adams, Timothy
Geographisches Institut, Humangeographie
Gmür, Désirée Ruth
Institut für Sozialanthropologie
Käser, Fabian David
Institut für Sozialanthropologie
Lanz, Kristina Verena
Geographisches Institut, Humangeographie
Marfurt, Franziska
Geographisches Institut, Integrative Geographie
Ryser, Sarah
Institut für Sozialanthropologie
Schubiger, Elisabeth
von Sury, Anna Asha
Institut für Sozialanthropologie
Gerber, Jean-Davidorcid-logo
Geographisches Institut, Humangeographie
Editor
Lozny, Ludomir R.
McGovern, Thomas
Subject(s)

300 - Social sciences...

300 - Social sciences...

700 - Arts::710 - Lan...

900 - History::910 - ...

ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
1574-0501
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Language
English
Description
We discuss the results of two research projects carried out by the Institute of Social Anthropology and Geography, University of Bern (Switzerland) regarding large-scale land acquisitions in Africa. Our case-studies are form Morocco, Ghana, Sierra Leone, Kenya, Tanzania, and Malawi. They illustrate the drama of the grabbed commons and economic consequences affecting marginalized groups. The results show that new land deals were made by foreign investors with local state officials and elites. The new rules made the land available for market-oriented productions and transferred the assets into state- or local elites- and international companies-owned properties. These changes adversily affected the traditional property rights scheme. New institutional changes eliminated communal ownership and access to other land-related commons such as water, pasture, fisheries, forestry, non-timber forest products, and wildlife vital for local livelihoods. We analyze how different local groups reacted to these dramas and what strategies they used to reinstall the commons, although with mixed success. Finally, we argue that only bottom-up institutional buildup provides essential basis for securing resilient livelihoods. Our studies allow for understanding the way how to use the commons in the future on local, national, and international level.
Handle
https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/65372
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 360c85 [14.04. 8:05]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo