Increasing adolescents’ physical activity levels through a comprehensive school‑based physical activity program: study protocol of the cluster randomized controlled trial Active School
Options
BORIS DOI
Date of Publication
September 2024
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute
Author
Nadenbousch, Andrea-Maria |
Subject(s)
Series
BMC Pediatrics
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
1471-2431
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Language
English
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
39232723
Description
Background The positive effects of regular physical activity on children and adolescents’ physical and mental health
are well-established. Despite these health benefits, most Swiss adolescents do not meet WHO’s recommended level
of physical activity, which includes a daily minimum of 60 min of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Due to their
inclusivity, schools are identified as a key setting to promote physical activity. Recently, the comprehensive school
physical activity program (CSPAP), in which teachers as physical activity leaders (PALs) play a crucial role to advance
comprehensive school-based physical activity promotion, has been discussed. However, such comprehensive
approaches are still lacking in Switzerland, and specific PAL trainings do not exist. Therefore, the aim of this study
is to implement and evaluate Active School, a comprehensive school-based physical activity program for Swiss secondary
schools with integrated PAL training.
Methods/design A cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 12 secondary schools (6 experimental, 6
waiting control schools) will assess baseline data and effectiveness of Active School at 12 and 24 months. Active
School includes five components based on the CSPAP. Each school is encouraged to set individual physical activity
goals in this regard. This process is guided by the PALs, who will participate in professional development training
before and during Active School implementation. As a primary outcome, students’ moderate-to-vigorous physical
activity will be assessed via accelerometers. As secondary outcomes, inactivity, light physical activity, step counts,
aerobic fitness and coordination will be measured, and students’ general wellbeing, learning behavior, and multiple
psychosocial measures related to physical activity will be assessed by questionnaires. The effectiveness evaluation
is accompanied by a process evaluation that focuses on the implementation outcomes of dose of delivery, reach,
feasibility, and sustainability. A mixed methods approach, including ripple effect mapping, will be employed to reconstruct
and understand the implementation process.
are well-established. Despite these health benefits, most Swiss adolescents do not meet WHO’s recommended level
of physical activity, which includes a daily minimum of 60 min of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Due to their
inclusivity, schools are identified as a key setting to promote physical activity. Recently, the comprehensive school
physical activity program (CSPAP), in which teachers as physical activity leaders (PALs) play a crucial role to advance
comprehensive school-based physical activity promotion, has been discussed. However, such comprehensive
approaches are still lacking in Switzerland, and specific PAL trainings do not exist. Therefore, the aim of this study
is to implement and evaluate Active School, a comprehensive school-based physical activity program for Swiss secondary
schools with integrated PAL training.
Methods/design A cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 12 secondary schools (6 experimental, 6
waiting control schools) will assess baseline data and effectiveness of Active School at 12 and 24 months. Active
School includes five components based on the CSPAP. Each school is encouraged to set individual physical activity
goals in this regard. This process is guided by the PALs, who will participate in professional development training
before and during Active School implementation. As a primary outcome, students’ moderate-to-vigorous physical
activity will be assessed via accelerometers. As secondary outcomes, inactivity, light physical activity, step counts,
aerobic fitness and coordination will be measured, and students’ general wellbeing, learning behavior, and multiple
psychosocial measures related to physical activity will be assessed by questionnaires. The effectiveness evaluation
is accompanied by a process evaluation that focuses on the implementation outcomes of dose of delivery, reach,
feasibility, and sustainability. A mixed methods approach, including ripple effect mapping, will be employed to reconstruct
and understand the implementation process.
Related URL
File(s)
File | File Type | Format | Size | License | Publisher/Copright statement | Content | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
s12887-024-05034-0.pdf | text | Adobe PDF | 2.06 MB | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) | published |