Timing of Initiation of Renal-Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury.
Options
BORIS DOI
Date of Publication
July 16, 2020
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute
Contributor
STARRT-AKI, Investigators | |
Bagshaw, Sean M | |
Wald, Ron | |
Adhikari, Neill K J | |
Bellomo, Rinaldo | |
Dreyfuss, Didier | |
Du, Bin | |
Gallagher, Martin P | |
Gaudry, Stéphane | |
Hoste, Eric A | |
Lamontagne, François | |
Joannidis, Michael | |
Landoni, Giovanni | |
Liu, Kathleen D | |
McAuley, Daniel F | |
McGuinness, Shay P | |
Neyra, Javier A | |
Nichol, Alistair D | |
Ostermann, Marlies | |
Palevsky, Paul M | |
Pettilä, Ville | |
Quenot, Jean-Pierre | |
Qiu, Haibo | |
Rochwerg, Bram | |
Schneider, Antoine G | |
Smith, Orla M | |
Thomé, Fernando | |
Thorpe, Kevin E | |
Vaara, Suvi | |
Weir, Matthew | |
Wang, Amanda Y | |
Young, Paul | |
Zarbock, Alexander |
Series
New England journal of medicine NEJM
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
0028-4793
Publisher
Massachusetts Medical Society MMS
Language
English
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
32668114
Description
BACKGROUND
Acute kidney injury is common in critically ill patients, many of whom receive renal-replacement therapy. However, the most effective timing for the initiation of such therapy remains uncertain.
METHODS
We conducted a multinational, randomized, controlled trial involving critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury. Patients were randomly assigned to receive an accelerated strategy of renal-replacement therapy (in which therapy was initiated within 12 hours after the patient had met eligibility criteria) or a standard strategy (in which renal-replacement therapy was discouraged unless conventional indications developed or acute kidney injury persisted for >72 hours). The primary outcome was death from any cause at 90 days.
RESULTS
Of the 3019 patients who had undergone randomization, 2927 (97.0%) were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (1465 in the accelerated-strategy group and 1462 in the standard-strategy group). Of these patients, renal-replacement therapy was performed in 1418 (96.8%) in the accelerated-strategy group and in 903 (61.8%) in the standard-strategy group. At 90 days, death had occurred in 643 patients (43.9%) in the accelerated-strategy group and in 639 (43.7%) in the standard-strategy group (relative risk, 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 1.09; P = 0.92). Among survivors at 90 days, continued dependence on renal-replacement therapy was confirmed in 85 of 814 patients (10.4%) in the accelerated-strategy group and in 49 of 815 patients (6.0%) in the standard-strategy group (relative risk, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.43). Adverse events occurred in 346 of 1503 patients (23.0%) in the accelerated-strategy group and in 245 of 1489 patients (16.5%) in the standard-strategy group (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury, an accelerated renal-replacement strategy was not associated with a lower risk of death at 90 days than a standard strategy. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; STARRT-AKI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02568722.).
Acute kidney injury is common in critically ill patients, many of whom receive renal-replacement therapy. However, the most effective timing for the initiation of such therapy remains uncertain.
METHODS
We conducted a multinational, randomized, controlled trial involving critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury. Patients were randomly assigned to receive an accelerated strategy of renal-replacement therapy (in which therapy was initiated within 12 hours after the patient had met eligibility criteria) or a standard strategy (in which renal-replacement therapy was discouraged unless conventional indications developed or acute kidney injury persisted for >72 hours). The primary outcome was death from any cause at 90 days.
RESULTS
Of the 3019 patients who had undergone randomization, 2927 (97.0%) were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (1465 in the accelerated-strategy group and 1462 in the standard-strategy group). Of these patients, renal-replacement therapy was performed in 1418 (96.8%) in the accelerated-strategy group and in 903 (61.8%) in the standard-strategy group. At 90 days, death had occurred in 643 patients (43.9%) in the accelerated-strategy group and in 639 (43.7%) in the standard-strategy group (relative risk, 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 1.09; P = 0.92). Among survivors at 90 days, continued dependence on renal-replacement therapy was confirmed in 85 of 814 patients (10.4%) in the accelerated-strategy group and in 49 of 815 patients (6.0%) in the standard-strategy group (relative risk, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.43). Adverse events occurred in 346 of 1503 patients (23.0%) in the accelerated-strategy group and in 245 of 1489 patients (16.5%) in the standard-strategy group (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury, an accelerated renal-replacement strategy was not associated with a lower risk of death at 90 days than a standard strategy. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; STARRT-AKI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02568722.).
File(s)
| File | File Type | Format | Size | License | Publisher/Copright statement | Content | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bagshaw NEnglJMed 2020.pdf | Adobe PDF | 550.92 KB | published |