• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Projects
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Fasting Before Cardiac Catheterization: Still Necessary? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.
 

Fasting Before Cardiac Catheterization: Still Necessary? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Options
  • Details
  • Files
Description
Orestis Efthimiou and David Meier are last co-­authors (equal contribution and shared corresponding authors).
BORIS DOI
10.48620/89420
Publisher DOI
10.1161/JAHA.124.040445
PubMed ID
40401623
Description
Background
Fasting before elective or nonurgent coronary angiography is commonly recommended to reduce the risk of adverse events, such as aspiration pneumonia. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of fasting versus nonfasting protocols on patient outcomes and satisfaction.Methods
We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized clinical trials comparing fasting and nonfasting states before cardiac catheterization. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse events including pneumonia, hypoglycemia, and nausea/vomiting. Secondary outcomes included individual adverse events and patient satisfaction. For each binary outcome we estimated crude event probabilities for each treatment arm. Next, we pooled study-specific results in meta-analyses using odds ratio (OR) and risk difference as effect measures for binary outcomes and standardized mean difference for satisfaction.Results
We identified 8 randomized clinical trials, including a total of 3147 patients. Our meta-analysis showed no evidence of a difference in the incidence of composite adverse events between fasting and nonfasting groups in ORs (OR, 1.08, [95% CI, 0.78-1.51], where OR<1 favors fasting). The crude event probabilities were 4.9% and 4.4% for fasting and nonfasting groups respectively, with an estimated risk difference =0.4% (-1.1% to 1.8%), where risk difference <0 favors fasting. Patient satisfaction was found higher in nonfasting protocols, standardized mean difference 0.62 (0.11-1.13).Conclusion
Our meta-analysis found no evidence that fasting before elective coronary angiography reduces adverse events. However, we found evidence that fasting reduces patient satisfaction. These findings question the necessity of fasting protocols in this context.Registration
URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024595465; Unique identifier: CRD42024595465.
Date of Publication
2025-06-03
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
Keyword(s)
cardiac catheterization
•
fasting
•
percutaneous coronary intervention
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Salihu, Adil
Fournier, Stephane
Hugelshofer, Sarah
Liabot, Quentin
Weerts, Victor
Tzimas, Georgios
Rancati, Valentina
Ferlay, Clemence
Zimmerli, Aurelia
Muller, Olivier
Lu, Henri
Antiochos, Panagiotis
Efthimiou, Orestisorcid-logo
Institute of General Practice and Primary Care (BIHAM)
Meier, David
Additional Credits
Institute of General Practice and Primary Care (BIHAM)
Series
Journal of the American Heart Association Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Publisher
Wiley
ISSN
2047-9980
Access(Rights)
open.access
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: ae9592 [15.12. 16:43]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo