Psychological intervention in individuals with subthreshold depression: individual participant data meta-analysis of treatment effects and moderators.
Options
BORIS DOI
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
40365980
Description
Background
It remains unclear which individuals with subthreshold depression benefit most from psychological intervention, and what long-term effects this has on symptom deterioration, response and remission.Aims
To synthesise psychological intervention benefits in adults with subthreshold depression up to 2 years, and explore participant-level effect-modifiers.Method
Randomised trials comparing psychological intervention with inactive control were identified via systematic search. Authors were contacted to obtain individual participant data (IPD), analysed using Bayesian one-stage meta-analysis. Treatment-covariate interactions were added to examine moderators. Hierarchical-additive models were used to explore treatment benefits conditional on baseline Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) values.Results
IPD of 10 671 individuals (50 studies) could be included. We found significant effects on depressive symptom severity up to 12 months (standardised mean-difference [s.m.d.] = -0.48 to -0.27). Effects could not be ascertained up to 24 months (s.m.d. = -0.18). Similar findings emerged for 50% symptom reduction (relative risk = 1.27-2.79), reliable improvement (relative risk = 1.38-3.17), deterioration (relative risk = 0.67-0.54) and close-to-symptom-free status (relative risk = 1.41-2.80). Among participant-level moderators, only initial depression and anxiety severity were highly credible (P > 0.99). Predicted treatment benefits decreased with lower symptom severity but remained minimally important even for very mild symptoms (s.m.d. = -0.33 for PHQ-9 = 5).Conclusions
Psychological intervention reduces the symptom burden in individuals with subthreshold depression up to 1 year, and protects against symptom deterioration. Benefits up to 2 years are less certain. We find strong support for intervention in subthreshold depression, particularly with PHQ-9 scores ≥ 10. For very mild symptoms, scalable treatments could be an attractive option.
It remains unclear which individuals with subthreshold depression benefit most from psychological intervention, and what long-term effects this has on symptom deterioration, response and remission.Aims
To synthesise psychological intervention benefits in adults with subthreshold depression up to 2 years, and explore participant-level effect-modifiers.Method
Randomised trials comparing psychological intervention with inactive control were identified via systematic search. Authors were contacted to obtain individual participant data (IPD), analysed using Bayesian one-stage meta-analysis. Treatment-covariate interactions were added to examine moderators. Hierarchical-additive models were used to explore treatment benefits conditional on baseline Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) values.Results
IPD of 10 671 individuals (50 studies) could be included. We found significant effects on depressive symptom severity up to 12 months (standardised mean-difference [s.m.d.] = -0.48 to -0.27). Effects could not be ascertained up to 24 months (s.m.d. = -0.18). Similar findings emerged for 50% symptom reduction (relative risk = 1.27-2.79), reliable improvement (relative risk = 1.38-3.17), deterioration (relative risk = 0.67-0.54) and close-to-symptom-free status (relative risk = 1.41-2.80). Among participant-level moderators, only initial depression and anxiety severity were highly credible (P > 0.99). Predicted treatment benefits decreased with lower symptom severity but remained minimally important even for very mild symptoms (s.m.d. = -0.33 for PHQ-9 = 5).Conclusions
Psychological intervention reduces the symptom burden in individuals with subthreshold depression up to 1 year, and protects against symptom deterioration. Benefits up to 2 years are less certain. We find strong support for intervention in subthreshold depression, particularly with PHQ-9 scores ≥ 10. For very mild symptoms, scalable treatments could be an attractive option.
Date of Publication
2025-05-14
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
100 - Philosophy::150 - Psychology
Keyword(s)
Meta-analysis
•
depressive disorders
•
precision medicine
•
prevention
•
psychological treatments
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Harrer, Mathias | |
Sprenger, Antonia A | |
Illing, Susan | |
Adriaanse, Marcel C | |
Albert, Steven M | |
Allart, Esther | |
Almeida, Osvaldo P | |
Basanovic, Julian | |
van Bastelaar, Kim M P | |
Batterham, Philip J | |
Baumeister, Harald | |
Blanco, Vanessa | |
Bø, Ragnhild | |
Casten, Robin J | |
Chan, Dicken | |
Christensen, Helen | |
Ciharova, Marketa | |
Cook, Lorna | |
Cornell, John | |
Davis, Elysia P | |
Dobson, Keith S | |
Dozeman, Elsien | |
Gilbody, Simon | |
Hankin, Benjamin L | |
Haringsma, Rimke | |
Hoorelbeke, Kristof | |
Irwin, Michael R | |
Jansen, Femke | |
Jonassen, Rune | |
Karyotaki, Eirini | |
Kawakami, Norito | |
Klein, J Philipp | |
Konnert, Candace | |
Imamura, Kotaro | |
Landrø, Nils Inge | |
Lara, María Asunción | |
Le, Huynh-Nhu | |
Lehr, Dirk | |
Luciano, Juan V | |
Moritz, Steffen | |
Mossey, Jana M | |
Muñoz, Ricardo F | |
Muntingh, Anna | |
Nobis, Stephanie | |
Olmstead, Richard | |
Otero, Patricia | |
Pibernik-Okanović, Mirjana | |
Pot, Anne Margriet | |
Reynolds, Charles F | |
Rovner, Barry W | |
Sanabria-Mazo, Juan P | |
Sander, Lasse B | |
Smit, Filip | |
Snoek, Frank J | |
Spek, Viola | |
Spinhoven, Philip | |
Stelmach, Liza | |
Terhorst, Yannik | |
Vázquez, Fernando L | |
Leeuw, Irma Verdonck-de | |
Watkins, Ed | |
Yang, Wenhui | |
Wong, Samuel Yeung Shan | |
Sakata, Masatsugu | |
Furukawa, Toshi A | |
Leucht, Stefan | |
Cuijpers, Pim | |
Buntrock, Claudia | |
Ebert, David Daniel |
Additional Credits
Institute of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy
Series
The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science
ISSN
1472-1465
Access(Rights)
open.access