What scale for local food system planning? Insights from French case studies
Options
BORIS DOI
Date of Publication
January 2, 2025
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute
Contributor
Series
Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
2152-0801
Publisher
Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems
Language
English
Publisher DOI
Description
This paper explores the critical role of scale in food system planning. Although there is growing awareness of the importance of considering the city-region scale in food system planning, a comprehensive understanding of the scale of planning is lacking in this evolving policy field. This study addresses this gap by analyzing a series of food system planning projects developed at different scales in France. Drawing on document analysis and semi-structured interviews with officials, the paper explores three key dimensions of scale: administrative, action, and governance scales. Findings reveal that there is no relevant one-size-fits-all administrative scale for all food system planning projects. Instead, each administrative scale has its own strengths and limitations. Smaller-scale planning is often more efficient for rapid implementation but may fall into the local trap, whereas larger-scale planning offers a more appropriate scale to meet the food supply-demand balance at a city-region scale but risks a long process of coordination and inefficient implementation. The study identifies local political willingness, legal competences, and spatial appropriateness as significant factors when determining at which scale to develop food system planning. Moreover, the study investigates how localities define “local” within their food system planning practices. They vary from the ambiguous “as close as possible,” administrative units, to quantified distances, but most action scales extend administrative boundaries. Finally, the study identifies locally designed governance strategies to match action scales and administrative scales, with empirical evidence from food system planning experiments applying cross-scalar and cross-local governance models. It also highlights challenges such as unclear distribution of responsibilities among jurisdictions, which hinders local implementation of actions. By providing empirical evidence, the paper contributes to a nuanced understanding of the scale issue in food system planning and emphasizes the importance of governance strategies and institutional design. The paper offers practitioners guidance on identifying and determining the scale of planning and governance strategies, while also providing scholars with directions for future research.
File(s)
File | File Type | Format | Size | License | Publisher/Copright statement | Content | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
document.pdf | text | Adobe PDF | 880.07 KB | published |