• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Craniospinal irradiation using pencil beam Scanning: The PSI experience.
 

Craniospinal irradiation using pencil beam Scanning: The PSI experience.

Options
  • Details
BORIS DOI
10.48620/76264
Date of Publication
November 2024
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute

Clinic of Radiation O...

Contributor
Bolsi, Alessandra
De Angelis, Claudio
Vázquez, Miriam
Siewert, Dorota
Correia, Dora
Bachmann, Nicolas
Clinic of Radiation Oncology
Lomax, Antony J
Pica, Alessia
Weber, Damien C
Clinic of Radiation Oncology
Subject(s)

600 - Technology::610...

Series
Physica Medica
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
1120-1797
Publisher
Elsevier
Language
English
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104817
PubMed ID
39393158
Uncontrolled Keywords

Children

Cranial spinal irradi...

Patient-related outco...

Proton treatment

Toxicity

dose-average LET

Description
Introduction
We present the dosimetric evaluation of craniospinal irradiation (CSI) treatments delivered with protons at Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), with special focus on local recurrences and late toxicity outcome.
Methods
This study included 71 children, adolescents and young adults (c-AYA), who received or intended to receive (3 patients, pts) CSI using PBS-PT at PSI between 2004 and January 2021. The most frequent primary tumours were: medulloblastoma (42 pts), ependymoma (8 pts) and germ cell tumors (6 pts). The patients were treated prone on Gantry1 (G1; 22 pts) up to 2017, and afterwards supine on Gantry2 (G2; 49 pts). Accuracy of prone vs. supine setup was evaluated. Nine patients received CSI for local failure (LF) after a first course of local fractionated radiation therapy (RT). For 59/71 patients (excluding three patients not receiving PBS-PT CSI and nine preirradiated) CSI plans were compared considering gantry and planning technique. Detailed analysis of the full treatment (CSI and boost series) was performed for 8 patients presenting with LFs (4 of them presented also distal failure) and for selected patients presenting with late toxicity (G2 to G4) or asymptomatic radiation-induced radiological findings.
Results
Supine positioning resulted in lower systematic and random errors as compared to prone (0.25 mm and 0.4 mm systematic errors respectively for supine and prone; random errors in PA direction reduced from 1.8 mm for prone to 1.4 mm for supine).
Conclusions
LFs were not correlated with potential dose inaccuracies or lack of robustness and no correlation of toxicities to enhanced LET have been observed.
Handle
https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/188993
Show full item
File(s)
FileFile TypeFormatSizeLicensePublisher/Copright statementContent
1-s2.0-S1120179724010743-main.pdftextAdobe PDF3.92 MBAttribution (CC BY 4.0)publishedOpen
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 396f6f [24.09. 11:22]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo