Inter-Reader Agreement for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Major Features and Final Categorization: A Subanalysis From a Prospective Multicenter Study.
Options
Description
Kollektivautorenschaft Forschungsgruppe "CEUS LI-RADS Trial Group", Autorin: Iuliana-Pompilia Radu (Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine)
BORIS DOI
Date of Publication
February 2025
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute
Contributor
Kuon Yeng Escalante, Cristina M | |
Siu Xiao, Tania | |
Kono, Yuko | |
Piscaglia, Fabio | |
Wilson, Stephanie R | |
Medellin, Alexandra | |
Rodgers, Shuchi K | |
Planz, Virginia | |
Kamaya, Aya | |
Fetzer, David T | |
Sidhu, Paul S | |
Wessner, Corinne E | |
Bradigan, Kristen | |
Eisenbrey, John R | |
Forsberg, Flemming | |
Lyshchik, Andrej |
Series
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
0278-4297
Publisher
Wiley
Language
English
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
39470295
Uncontrolled Keywords
Description
Objectives
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is used to definitively diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients at risk. However, the user variability associated with CEUS LI-RADS has not been validated in North American and European patients. This study aims to evaluate the inter-reader agreements of CEUS LI-RADS features for, and final categorization of, HCC in patients at risk.Methods
This retrospective multicenter clinical study used the database of a previous prospective multinational study, evaluating the accuracy of CEUS LI-RADS for HCC diagnosis in patients at risk. All cases were first evaluated by a site physician performing/supervising the CEUS examination. Randomly selected cases were re-evaluated by a blinded central reader. Final diagnosis was confirmed with the reference standard, which was a composite of imaging tests and histology. Cohen's kappa test was used to evaluate inter-reader agreement.Results
This study included 150 liver nodules and 58.0% (87/150) were confirmed as HCC, 4.7% (7/150) non-HCC malignancies, 22.7% (34/150) had no confirmed final diagnosis, and 14.7% (22/150) were nonmalignant. Inter-reader agreements were substantial for CEUS LI-RADS categorization (κ = 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-0.71) and major features assessment (ranged κ = 0.64-0.78), LR-5 (κ = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.52-0.77), and LR-M (κ = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.44-0.90), while for LR-1 and LR-2 categorization was almost perfect (κ = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.65-1.00).Conclusion
Our study reported a substantial inter-reader agreement for overall CEUS LI-RADS categorization, especially for LR-5 and LR-M, and major imaging features of HCC, further confirming CEUS LI-RADS as a valuable and reliable tool for diagnosis of HCC.
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is used to definitively diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients at risk. However, the user variability associated with CEUS LI-RADS has not been validated in North American and European patients. This study aims to evaluate the inter-reader agreements of CEUS LI-RADS features for, and final categorization of, HCC in patients at risk.Methods
This retrospective multicenter clinical study used the database of a previous prospective multinational study, evaluating the accuracy of CEUS LI-RADS for HCC diagnosis in patients at risk. All cases were first evaluated by a site physician performing/supervising the CEUS examination. Randomly selected cases were re-evaluated by a blinded central reader. Final diagnosis was confirmed with the reference standard, which was a composite of imaging tests and histology. Cohen's kappa test was used to evaluate inter-reader agreement.Results
This study included 150 liver nodules and 58.0% (87/150) were confirmed as HCC, 4.7% (7/150) non-HCC malignancies, 22.7% (34/150) had no confirmed final diagnosis, and 14.7% (22/150) were nonmalignant. Inter-reader agreements were substantial for CEUS LI-RADS categorization (κ = 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-0.71) and major features assessment (ranged κ = 0.64-0.78), LR-5 (κ = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.52-0.77), and LR-M (κ = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.44-0.90), while for LR-1 and LR-2 categorization was almost perfect (κ = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.65-1.00).Conclusion
Our study reported a substantial inter-reader agreement for overall CEUS LI-RADS categorization, especially for LR-5 and LR-M, and major imaging features of HCC, further confirming CEUS LI-RADS as a valuable and reliable tool for diagnosis of HCC.
File(s)
| File | File Type | Format | Size | License | Publisher/Copright statement | Content | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J of Ultrasound Medicine - 2024 - Kuon Yeng Escalante - Inter‐Reader Agreement for Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasound Liver.pdf | text | Adobe PDF | 311.18 KB | published |