• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Critical airway-related incidents and near misses in anaesthesia: a qualitative study of a critical incident reporting system.
 

Critical airway-related incidents and near misses in anaesthesia: a qualitative study of a critical incident reporting system.

Options
  • Details
BORIS DOI
10.48350/197806
Date of Publication
August 2024
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute

Emeriti, Medizinische...

Contributor
Pedersen, Tina H
Nabecker, Sabine
Greif, Robertorcid-logo
Emeriti, Medizinische Fakultät
Theiler, Lorenz
Kleine-Brueggeney, Maren
Subject(s)

600 - Technology::610...

Series
British journal of anaesthesia
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
1471-6771
Publisher
Elsevier
Language
English
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.bja.2024.04.052
PubMed ID
38866639
Uncontrolled Keywords

airway management cri...

Description
BACKGROUND

Many serious adverse events in anaesthesia are retrospectively rated as preventable. Anonymous reporting of near misses to a critical incident reporting system (CIRS) can identify structural weaknesses and improve quality, but incidents are often underreported.

METHODS

This prospective qualitative study aimed to identify conceptions of a CIRS and reasons for underreporting at a single Swiss centre. Anaesthesia cases were screened to identify critical airway-related incidents that qualified to be reported to the CIRS. Anaesthesia providers involved in these incidents were individually interviewed. Factors that prevented or encouraged reporting of critical incidents to the CIRS were evaluated. Interview data were analysed using the Framework method.

RESULTS

Of 3668 screened airway management procedures, 101 cases (2.8%) involved a critical incident. Saturation was reached after interviewing 21 anaesthesia providers, who had been involved in 42/101 critical incidents (41.6%). Only one incident (1.0%) had been reported to the CIRS, demonstrating significant underreporting. Interviews revealed highly variable views on the aims of the CIRS with an overall high threshold for reporting a critical incident. Factors hindering reporting of cases included concerns regarding identifiability of the reported incident and involved healthcare providers.

CONCLUSIONS

Methods to foster anonymity of reporting, such as by national rather than departmental critical incident reporting system databases, and a change in culture is required to enhance reporting of critical incidents. Institutions managing a critical incident reporting system need to ensure timely feedback to the team regarding lessons learned, consequences, and changes to standards of care owing to reported critical incidents. Consistent reporting and assessment of critical incidents is required to allow the full potential of a critical incident reporting system.
Handle
https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/178153
Show full item
File(s)
FileFile TypeFormatSizeLicensePublisher/Copright statementContent
1-s2.0-S0007091224002769-main.pdftextAdobe PDF505.78 KBAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)publishedOpen
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 960e9e [21.08. 13:49]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo