• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Effectiveness of stress arousal reappraisal and stress-is-enhancing mindset interventions on task performance outcomes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
 

Effectiveness of stress arousal reappraisal and stress-is-enhancing mindset interventions on task performance outcomes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Options
  • Details
BORIS DOI
10.48350/195682
Date of Publication
April 4, 2024
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute

Institut für Medizini...

Graduate School for H...

Contributor
Bosshard, Michel
Institut für Medizinische Lehre, Assessment und Evaluation, Forschung / Evaluation
Institut für Medizinische Lehre, Assessment und Evaluation (AAE)
Graduate School for Health Sciences (GHS)
Gomez, Patrick
Subject(s)

300 - Social sciences...

600 - Technology::610...

Series
Scientific Reports
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
2045-2322
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
Language
English
Publisher DOI
10.1038/s41598-024-58408-w
PubMed ID
38575696
Description
Stress arousal reappraisal (SAR) and stress-is-enhancing (SIE) mindset interventions aim to promote a more adaptive stress response by educating individuals about the functionality of stress. As part of this framework, an adaptive stress response is coupled with improved performance on stressful tasks. The goal of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions on task performance. The literature search yielded 44 effect sizes, and a random-effects model with Knapp-Hartung adjustment was used to pool them. The results revealed an overall small significant improvement in task performance (d = 0.23, p < 0.001). The effect size was significantly larger for mixed interventions (i.e., SAR/SIE mindset instructions combined with additional content, k = 5, d = 0.45, p = 0.004) than SAR-only interventions (k = 33, d = 0.22, p < 0.001) and SIE mindset-only interventions (k = 6, d = 0.18, p = 0.22) and tended to be larger for public performance tasks than cognitive written tasks (k = 14, d = 0.34, p < 0.001 vs. k = 30, d = 0.20, p = 0.002). Although SAR and SIE mindset interventions are not "silver bullets", they offer a promising cost-effective low-threshold approach to improve performance across various domains.
Handle
https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/176525
Show full item
File(s)
FileFile TypeFormatSizeLicensePublisher/Copright statementContent
s41598-024-58408-w.pdftextAdobe PDF2.56 MBAttribution (CC BY 4.0)publishedOpen
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 27ad28 [15.10. 15:21]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo