Enzymatic debridement with bromelain and development of bacteremia in burn injuries: A retrospective cohort study.
Options
BORIS DOI
Date of Publication
March 2024
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute
Author
Deplazes, Barla C | |
Hofmaenner, Daniel A | |
Scheier, Thomas C | |
Epprecht, Jana | |
Mayer, Michelle | |
Schweizer, Tiziano A | |
Buehler, Philipp K | |
Brugger, Silvio D |
Subject(s)
Series
Burns
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
0305-4179
Publisher
Elsevier
Language
English
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
38182450
Uncontrolled Keywords
Description
BACKGROUND
Debridement is crucial for effective wound management in patients with severe burn injuries, and bromelain, a proteolytic enzyme from pineapple stems, has emerged as a promising alternative for surgery. However, potential links of bromelain use to fever and sepsis have raised some concerns. Given the uncertainty as to whether this was caused by infection or other inflammatory sources, we aimed to investigate if the use of topical bromelain was associated with bacteremia.
METHODS
This single-centre retrospective cohort study included critically ill adult patients with severe burn injuries hospitalised at the Burn Center of the University Hospital Zurich between January 2017 and December 2021. Data were collected from two in-hospital electronic medical records databases. Our primary outcome, the association between topical bromelain treatment and the development of bacteremia, was investigated using a competing risk regression model, taking into account the competing risk of death. As a secondary outcome, the relationship between bromelain treatment and overall ICU mortality was examined using a Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS
The study included 269 patients with a median age of 50 years and median burnt total body surface area of 19%. A first bacteremia occurred in 61 patients (23%) after a median time of 6 days. Bromelain treatment was given to 83 (31%) of patients, with 22 (27%) of these developing bacteremia. In the fully adjusted competing risk regression model, no evidence for an association between bromelain treatment and bacteremia was found (SHR 0.79, 95%CI 0.42-1.48, p = 0.47). During hospital stay, 40 (15%) of patients died. There was no significant difference in mortality between patients treated with bromelain and those who were not (HR 0.55, 95%CI 0.26-1.20, p = 0.14). Among the five multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens identified, three were found in patients with bromelain treatment.
CONCLUSION
Our study did not confirm an association between topical bromelain and bacteremia in patients with severe burn injuries. This finding can inform evidence-based practices by addressing concerns about potential risks of bromelain use, contributing to the development of more effective and safe burn wound management strategies.
Debridement is crucial for effective wound management in patients with severe burn injuries, and bromelain, a proteolytic enzyme from pineapple stems, has emerged as a promising alternative for surgery. However, potential links of bromelain use to fever and sepsis have raised some concerns. Given the uncertainty as to whether this was caused by infection or other inflammatory sources, we aimed to investigate if the use of topical bromelain was associated with bacteremia.
METHODS
This single-centre retrospective cohort study included critically ill adult patients with severe burn injuries hospitalised at the Burn Center of the University Hospital Zurich between January 2017 and December 2021. Data were collected from two in-hospital electronic medical records databases. Our primary outcome, the association between topical bromelain treatment and the development of bacteremia, was investigated using a competing risk regression model, taking into account the competing risk of death. As a secondary outcome, the relationship between bromelain treatment and overall ICU mortality was examined using a Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS
The study included 269 patients with a median age of 50 years and median burnt total body surface area of 19%. A first bacteremia occurred in 61 patients (23%) after a median time of 6 days. Bromelain treatment was given to 83 (31%) of patients, with 22 (27%) of these developing bacteremia. In the fully adjusted competing risk regression model, no evidence for an association between bromelain treatment and bacteremia was found (SHR 0.79, 95%CI 0.42-1.48, p = 0.47). During hospital stay, 40 (15%) of patients died. There was no significant difference in mortality between patients treated with bromelain and those who were not (HR 0.55, 95%CI 0.26-1.20, p = 0.14). Among the five multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens identified, three were found in patients with bromelain treatment.
CONCLUSION
Our study did not confirm an association between topical bromelain and bacteremia in patients with severe burn injuries. This finding can inform evidence-based practices by addressing concerns about potential risks of bromelain use, contributing to the development of more effective and safe burn wound management strategies.
File(s)
| File | File Type | Format | Size | License | Publisher/Copright statement | Content | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-s2.0-S0305417923002607-main.pdf | text | Adobe PDF | 1.19 MB | Attribution (CC BY 4.0) | published |