• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Clinical and digital assessment of tooth wear.
 

Clinical and digital assessment of tooth wear.

Options
  • Details
BORIS DOI
10.48350/191326
Date of Publication
January 5, 2024
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute

Zahnmedizinische Klin...

Contributor
Al-Seelawi, Zahra
Hermann, Nuno V
Peutzfeldt, Anne
Zahnmedizinische Kliniken (ZMK) - Klinik für Zahnerhaltung, Präventiv- und Kinderzahnmedizin
Baram, Sara
Bakke, Merete
Sonnesen, Liselotte
Tsakanikou, Angeliki
Rahiotis, Christos
Benetti, Ana R
Subject(s)

600 - Technology::610...

Series
Scientific Reports
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
2045-2322
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
Language
English
Publisher DOI
10.1038/s41598-023-50107-2
PubMed ID
38182632
Description
The aim of this study was to compare the assessment of tooth wear performed on digital models with the one conducted at the clinical examination. Seventy-eight volunteers (29 males and 49 females, age range 20-30 years) with at least 24 teeth, normal oral function, and a neutral transverse relationship were examined. During the clinical examination, dental wear was registered according to the Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE) index. Subsequently, the BEWE index was blindly applied by two examiners on digital models obtained from the volunteers. Data were analyzed using weighted Cohen's kappa coefficient and correlation tests with a confidence interval of 95%. All volunteers showed signs of tooth wear. Anterior teeth showed increased severity of tooth wear than first molars. Early loss of tooth substance could be identified on the digital models, including in areas with challenging direct intraoral visual access. Approximately 50% of the scores based on clinical examination agreed with those based on examination of digital models (k = 0.543, p < 0.01). A moderate, positive correlation was observed between scores registered clinically and on digital models (Spearman's rho = 0.560, p < 0.001). Considering the rather low agreement between the clinical and digital scores, alternatives to using BEWE on digital models are needed.
Handle
https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/173148
Show full item
File(s)
FileFile TypeFormatSizeLicensePublisher/Copright statementContent
s41598-023-50107-2.pdftextAdobe PDF1.4 MBAttribution (CC BY 4.0)publishedOpen
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 27ad28 [15.10. 15:21]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo