A survey of preferences for respiratory support in the intensive care unit for patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure.
Options
BORIS DOI
Date of Publication
November 2023
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute
Author
Aslam, Tayyba N | |
Klitgaard, Thomas L | |
Ahlstedt, Christian A O | |
Andersen, Finn H | |
Chew, Michelle S | |
Collet, Marie O | |
Cronhjort, Maria | |
Estrup, Stine | |
Fossum, Ole K | |
Frisvold, Shirin K | |
Gillmann, Hans-Joerg | |
Granholm, Anders | |
Gundem, Trine M | |
Hauss, Kristin | |
Hollenberg, Jacob | |
Huanca Condori, Maria E | |
Hästbacka, Johanna | |
Johnstad, Bror A | |
Keus, Eric | |
Kjaer, Maj-Brit N | |
Klepstad, Pål | |
Krag, Mette | |
Kvåle, Reidar | |
Malbrain, Manu L N G | |
Meyhoff, Christian S | |
Morgan, Matt | |
Møller, Anders | |
Poulsen, Lone M | |
Robertson, Andrew C | |
Schjørring, Olav L | |
Siegemund, Martin | |
Sigurdsson, Martin I | |
Sjövall, Fredrik | |
Strand, Kristian | |
Stueber, Thomas | |
Szczeklik, Wojciech | |
Wahlin, Rebecka R | |
Wangberg, Helge L | |
Wian, Karl-Andre | |
Wichmann, Sine | |
Hofsø, Kristin | |
Møller, Morten H | |
Perner, Anders | |
Rasmussen, Bodil S | |
Laake, Jon H |
Subject(s)
Series
Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
0001-5172
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
Language
English
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
37737652
Uncontrolled Keywords
Description
BACKGROUND
When caring for mechanically ventilated adults with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF), clinicians are faced with an uncertain choice between ventilator modes allowing for spontaneous breaths or ventilation fully controlled by the ventilator. The preferences of clinicians managing such patients, and what motivates their choice of ventilator mode, are largely unknown. To better understand how clinicians' preferences may impact the choice of ventilatory support for patients with AHRF, we issued a survey to an international network of intensive care unit (ICU) researchers.
METHODS
We distributed an online survey with 32 broadly similar and interlinked questions on how clinicians prioritise spontaneous or controlled ventilation in invasively ventilated patients with AHRF of different severity, and which factors determine their choice.
RESULTS
The survey was distributed to 1337 recipients in 12 countries. Of these, 415 (31%) completed the survey either fully (52%) or partially (48%). Most respondents were identified as medical specialists (87%) or physicians in training (11%). Modes allowing for spontaneous ventilation were considered preferable in mild AHRF, with controlled ventilation considered as progressively more important in moderate and severe AHRF. Among respondents there was strong support (90%) for a randomised clinical trial comparing spontaneous with controlled ventilation in patients with moderate AHRF.
CONCLUSIONS
The responses from this international survey suggest that there is clinical equipoise for the preferred ventilator mode in patients with AHRF of moderate severity. We found strong support for a randomised trial comparing modes of ventilation in patients with moderate AHRF.
When caring for mechanically ventilated adults with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF), clinicians are faced with an uncertain choice between ventilator modes allowing for spontaneous breaths or ventilation fully controlled by the ventilator. The preferences of clinicians managing such patients, and what motivates their choice of ventilator mode, are largely unknown. To better understand how clinicians' preferences may impact the choice of ventilatory support for patients with AHRF, we issued a survey to an international network of intensive care unit (ICU) researchers.
METHODS
We distributed an online survey with 32 broadly similar and interlinked questions on how clinicians prioritise spontaneous or controlled ventilation in invasively ventilated patients with AHRF of different severity, and which factors determine their choice.
RESULTS
The survey was distributed to 1337 recipients in 12 countries. Of these, 415 (31%) completed the survey either fully (52%) or partially (48%). Most respondents were identified as medical specialists (87%) or physicians in training (11%). Modes allowing for spontaneous ventilation were considered preferable in mild AHRF, with controlled ventilation considered as progressively more important in moderate and severe AHRF. Among respondents there was strong support (90%) for a randomised clinical trial comparing spontaneous with controlled ventilation in patients with moderate AHRF.
CONCLUSIONS
The responses from this international survey suggest that there is clinical equipoise for the preferred ventilator mode in patients with AHRF of moderate severity. We found strong support for a randomised trial comparing modes of ventilation in patients with moderate AHRF.
File(s)
File | File Type | Format | Size | License | Publisher/Copright statement | Content |
---|