• LOGIN
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publication
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • LOGIN
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. A survey of preferences for respiratory support in the intensive care unit for patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure.
 

A survey of preferences for respiratory support in the intensive care unit for patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure.

Options
  • Details
BORIS DOI
10.48350/186528
Date of Publication
November 2023
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute

Universitätsklinik fü...

Author
Aslam, Tayyba N
Klitgaard, Thomas L
Ahlstedt, Christian A O
Andersen, Finn H
Chew, Michelle S
Collet, Marie O
Cronhjort, Maria
Estrup, Stine
Fossum, Ole K
Frisvold, Shirin K
Gillmann, Hans-Joerg
Granholm, Anders
Gundem, Trine M
Hauss, Kristin
Hollenberg, Jacob
Huanca Condori, Maria E
Hästbacka, Johanna
Johnstad, Bror A
Keus, Eric
Kjaer, Maj-Brit N
Klepstad, Pål
Krag, Mette
Kvåle, Reidar
Malbrain, Manu L N G
Meyhoff, Christian S
Morgan, Matt
Møller, Anders
Pfortmüller, Carmen
Universitätsklinik für Intensivmedizin
Poulsen, Lone M
Robertson, Andrew C
Schefold, Jörg Christian
Universitätsklinik für Intensivmedizin
Schjørring, Olav L
Siegemund, Martin
Sigurdsson, Martin I
Sjövall, Fredrik
Strand, Kristian
Stueber, Thomas
Szczeklik, Wojciech
Wahlin, Rebecka R
Wangberg, Helge L
Wian, Karl-Andre
Wichmann, Sine
Hofsø, Kristin
Møller, Morten H
Perner, Anders
Rasmussen, Bodil S
Laake, Jon H
Subject(s)

600 - Technology::610...

Series
Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
0001-5172
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
Language
English
Publisher DOI
10.1111/aas.14317
PubMed ID
37737652
Uncontrolled Keywords

acute hypoxaemic resp...

Description
BACKGROUND

When caring for mechanically ventilated adults with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF), clinicians are faced with an uncertain choice between ventilator modes allowing for spontaneous breaths or ventilation fully controlled by the ventilator. The preferences of clinicians managing such patients, and what motivates their choice of ventilator mode, are largely unknown. To better understand how clinicians' preferences may impact the choice of ventilatory support for patients with AHRF, we issued a survey to an international network of intensive care unit (ICU) researchers.

METHODS

We distributed an online survey with 32 broadly similar and interlinked questions on how clinicians prioritise spontaneous or controlled ventilation in invasively ventilated patients with AHRF of different severity, and which factors determine their choice.

RESULTS

The survey was distributed to 1337 recipients in 12 countries. Of these, 415 (31%) completed the survey either fully (52%) or partially (48%). Most respondents were identified as medical specialists (87%) or physicians in training (11%). Modes allowing for spontaneous ventilation were considered preferable in mild AHRF, with controlled ventilation considered as progressively more important in moderate and severe AHRF. Among respondents there was strong support (90%) for a randomised clinical trial comparing spontaneous with controlled ventilation in patients with moderate AHRF.

CONCLUSIONS

The responses from this international survey suggest that there is clinical equipoise for the preferred ventilator mode in patients with AHRF of moderate severity. We found strong support for a randomised trial comparing modes of ventilation in patients with moderate AHRF.
Handle
https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/170157
Show full item
File(s)
FileFile TypeFormatSizeLicensePublisher/Copright statementContent
  View More
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: d1c7f7 [27.06. 13:56]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo