• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Effect of Thoracic Epidural Ropivacaine versus Bupivacaine on Lower Urinary Tract Function: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
 

Effect of Thoracic Epidural Ropivacaine versus Bupivacaine on Lower Urinary Tract Function: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Options
  • Details
BORIS DOI
10.7892/boris.107624
Date of Publication
March 2018
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute

Department for BioMed...

Universitätsklinik fü...

Universitätsklinik fü...

Contributor
Girsberger, Stefan Alexander
Universitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Schmerztherapie
Schneider, Marc Philipp
Department for BioMedical Research, Forschungsgruppe Urologie
Löffel, Lukas M
Burkhard, Fiona Christine
Universitätsklinik für Urologie
Wüthrich, Patrick Yvesorcid-logo
Universitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Schmerztherapie
Subject(s)

600 - Technology::610...

Series
Anesthesiology
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
0003-3022
Publisher
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Language
English
Publisher DOI
10.1097/ALN.0000000000001980
PubMed ID
29189291
Description
BACKGROUND

Thoracic epidural analgesia with bupivacaine resulted in clinically relevant postvoid residuals due to detrusor underactivity. This study aimed to compare the risk of bladder dysfunction with ropivacaine versus bupivacaine using postvoid residuals and maximum flow rates. Our hypothesis was that ropivacaine would result in lower postvoid residuals, because ropivacaine has been shown to have less effect on motor blockade.

METHODS

In this single-center, parallel-group, randomized, double-blind superiority trial, 42 patients undergoing open renal surgery were equally allocated to receive epidural bupivacaine 0.125% or ropivacaine 0.2%, and 36 were finally included. Inclusion criterion was normal bladder function. Patients underwent urodynamic investigations preoperatively and during thoracic epidural analgesia. Primary outcome was the difference in postvoid residual preoperatively and during thoracic epidural analgesia postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were changes in maximum flow rate between and within the groups.

RESULTS

Median difference in postvoid residual (ml) from baseline to postoperatively was 300 (range, 30 to 510; P < 0.001) for bupivacaine and 125 (range, -30 to 350; P = 0.011) for ropivacaine, with a significant mean difference between groups (-175; 95% confidence interval -295 to -40; P = 0.012). Median difference in maximum flow rate (ml/s) was more pronounced with bupivacaine (-12; range, -28 to 3; P < 0.001) than with ropivacaine (-4; range, -16 to 7; P = 0.025) with a significant mean difference between groups (7; 95% confidence interval 0 to 12; P = 0.028). Pain scores were similar. No adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Postvoid residuals were significantly lower using ropivacaine compared to bupivacaine for thoracic epidural analgesia reflecting less impairment of detrusor function with ropivacaine.
Handle
https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/155958
Show full item
File(s)
FileFile TypeFormatSizeLicensePublisher/Copright statementContent
00000542-900000000-97022.pdftextAdobe PDF729.14 KBpublisherpublishedOpen
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 396f6f [24.09. 11:22]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo