• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease.
 

Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease.

Options
  • Details
BORIS DOI
10.7892/boris.93029
Date of Publication
January 5, 2017
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute

Universitätsklinik fü...

Contributor
Hiatt, William R
Fowkes, F Gerry R
Heizer, Gretchen
Berger, Jeffrey S
Baumgartner, Iris
Universitätsklinik für Angiologie
Held, Peter
Katona, Brian G
Mahaffey, Kenneth W
Norgren, Lars
Jones, W Schuyler
Blomster, Juuso
Millegård, Marcus
Reist, Craig
Patel, Manesh R
Subject(s)

600 - Technology::610...

Series
New England journal of medicine NEJM
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
0028-4793
Publisher
Massachusetts Medical Society MMS
Language
English
Publisher DOI
10.1056/NEJMoa1611688
PubMed ID
27959717
Description
Background Peripheral artery disease is considered to be a manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis with associated adverse cardiovascular and limb events. Data from previous trials have suggested that patients receiving clopidogrel monotherapy had a lower risk of cardiovascular events than those receiving aspirin. We wanted to compare clopidogrel with ticagrelor, a potent antiplatelet agent, in patients with peripheral artery disease. Methods In this double-blind, event-driven trial, we randomly assigned 13,885 patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease to receive monotherapy with ticagrelor (90 mg twice daily) or clopidogrel (75 mg once daily). Patients were eligible if they had an ankle-brachial index (ABI) of 0.80 or less or had undergone previous revascularization of the lower limbs. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of adjudicated cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke. The primary safety end point was major bleeding. The median follow-up was 30 months. Results The median age of the patients was 66 years, and 72% were men; 43% were enrolled on the basis of the ABI and 57% on the basis of previous revascularization. The mean baseline ABI in all patients was 0.71, 76.6% of the patients had claudication, and 4.6% had critical limb ischemia. The primary efficacy end point occurred in 751 of 6930 patients (10.8%) receiving ticagrelor and in 740 of 6955 (10.6%) receiving clopidogrel (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92 to 1.13; P=0.65). In each group, acute limb ischemia occurred in 1.7% of the patients (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.33; P=0.85) and major bleeding in 1.6% (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.43; P=0.49). Conclusions In patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease, ticagrelor was not shown to be superior to clopidogrel for the reduction of cardiovascular events. Major bleeding occurred at similar rates among the patients in the two trial groups. (Funded by AstraZeneca; EUCLID ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01732822 .).
Handle
https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/148069
Show full item
File(s)
FileFile TypeFormatSizeLicensePublisher/Copright statementContent
nejmoa1611688.pdftextAdobe PDF281.18 KBpublisherpublishedOpen
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 396f6f [24.09. 11:22]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo