• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Clinical usefulness of gene-expression profile to rule out acute rejection after heart transplantation: CARGO II.
 

Clinical usefulness of gene-expression profile to rule out acute rejection after heart transplantation: CARGO II.

Options
  • Details
BORIS DOI
10.7892/boris.76635
Date of Publication
January 7, 2016
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute

Universitätsklinik fü...

Contributor
Crespo-Leiro, Maria G
Stypmann, Jörg
Schulz, Uwe
Zuckermann, Andreas
Mohacsi, Paul
Universitätsklinik für Kardiologie
Bara, Christoph
Ross, Heather
Parameshwar, Jayan
Zakliczyński, Michal
Fiocchi, Roberto
Hoefer, Daniel
Colvin, Monica
Deng, Mario C
Leprince, Pascal
Elashoff, Barbara
Yee, James P
Vanhaecke, Johan
Subject(s)

600 - Technology::610...

Series
European Heart Journal
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
0195-668X
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Language
English
Publisher DOI
10.1093/eurheartj/ehv682
PubMed ID
26746629
Uncontrolled Keywords

AlloMap

Heart transplant

Molecular diagnostics...

Organ rejection

Rejection surveillanc...

Tests

Description
AIMS
A non-invasive gene-expression profiling (GEP) test for rejection surveillance of heart transplant recipients originated in the USA. A European-based study, Cardiac Allograft Rejection Gene Expression Observational II Study (CARGO II), was conducted to further clinically validate the GEP test performance.

METHODS AND RESULTS
Blood samples for GEP testing (AlloMap(®), CareDx, Brisbane, CA, USA) were collected during post-transplant surveillance. The reference standard for rejection status was based on histopathology grading of tissue from endomyocardial biopsy. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), negative (NPVs), and positive predictive values (PPVs) for the GEP scores (range 0-39) were computed. Considering the GEP score of 34 as a cut-off (>6 months post-transplantation), 95.5% (381/399) of GEP tests were true negatives, 4.5% (18/399) were false negatives, 10.2% (6/59) were true positives, and 89.8% (53/59) were false positives. Based on 938 paired biopsies, the GEP test score AUC-ROC for distinguishing ≥3A rejection was 0.70 and 0.69 for ≥2-6 and >6 months post-transplantation, respectively. Depending on the chosen threshold score, the NPV and PPV range from 98.1 to 100% and 2.0 to 4.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION
For ≥2-6 and >6 months post-transplantation, CARGO II GEP score performance (AUC-ROC = 0.70 and 0.69) is similar to the CARGO study results (AUC-ROC = 0.71 and 0.67). The low prevalence of ACR contributes to the high NPV and limited PPV of GEP testing. The choice of threshold score for practical use of GEP testing should consider overall clinical assessment of the patient's baseline risk for rejection.
Handle
https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/138565
Show full item
File(s)
FileFile TypeFormatSizeLicensePublisher/Copright statementContent
OA-106, Crespo-Leiro et al, Clinical usefulness of gene-expression.pdftextAdobe PDF335.07 KBpublishedOpen
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 27ad28 [15.10. 15:21]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo