• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. The role of psychological stress in inflammatory bowel disease: quality assessment of methods of 18 prospective studies and suggestions for future research
 

The role of psychological stress in inflammatory bowel disease: quality assessment of methods of 18 prospective studies and suggestions for future research

Options
  • Details
BORIS DOI
10.48350/32404
Date of Publication
2009
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute

Universitätsklinik fü...

Contributor
Camara, Rafael
Universitätsklinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Kompetenzbereich für Psychosomatische Medizin
Ziegler, Roger
Universitätsklinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Kompetenzbereich für Psychosomatische Medizin
Begré, Stefan
Universitätsklinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Kompetenzbereich für Psychosomatische Medizin
Schoepfer, Alain M
von Känel, Roland
Universitätsklinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Kompetenzbereich für Psychosomatische Medizin
Series
Digestion
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
0012-2823
Publisher
Karger
Language
English
Publisher DOI
10.1159/000226087
PubMed ID
19657191
Description
BACKGROUND: Enquiries among patients on the one hand and experimental and observational studies on the other suggest an influence of stress on inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). However, since this influence remains hypothetical, further research is essential. We aimed to devise recommendations for future investigations in IBD by means of scrutinizing previously applied methodology. METHODS: We critically reviewed prospective clinical studies on the effect of psychological stress on IBD. Eligible studies were searched by means of the PubMed electronic library and through checking the bibliographies of located sources. RESULTS: We identified 20 publications resulting from 18 different studies. Sample sizes ranged between 10 and 155 participants. Study designs in terms of patient assessment, control variables, and applied psychometric instruments varied substantially across studies. Methodological strengths and weaknesses were irregularly dispersed. Thirteen studies reported significant relationships between stress and adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Study designs, including accuracy of outcome assessment and repeated sampling of outcomes (i.e. symptoms, clinical, and endoscopic), depended upon conditions like sample size, participants' compliance, and available resources. Meeting additional criteria of sound methodology, like taking into account covariates of the disease and its course, is strongly recommended to possibly improve study designs in future IBD research.
Handle
https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/105835
Show full item
File(s)
FileFile TypeFormatSizeLicensePublisher/Copright statementContent
000226087.pdftextAdobe PDF317.57 KBpublishedOpen
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 396f6f [24.09. 11:22]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo