• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Childhood leukaemia and socioeconomic status: what is the evidence?
 

Childhood leukaemia and socioeconomic status: what is the evidence?

Options
  • Details
BORIS DOI
10.7892/boris.27359
Date of Publication
2008
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute

Institut für Sozial- ...

Contributor
Adam, Martin
Institut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
Rebholz, Cornelia
Institut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
Egger, Matthiasorcid-logo
Institut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
Zwahlen, Marcelorcid-logo
Institut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
Kühni, Claudia
Institut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
Series
Radiation protection dosimetry
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
0144-8420
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Language
English
Publisher DOI
10.1093/rpd/ncn261
PubMed ID
18927134
Description
The objectives of this systematic review are to summarise the current literature on socioeconomic status (SES) and the risk of childhood leukaemia, to highlight methodological problems and formulate recommendations for future research. Starting from the systematic review of Poole et al. (Socioeconomic status and childhood leukaemia: a review. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2006;35(2):370-384.), an electronic literature search was performed covering August 2002-April 2008. It showed that (1) the results are heterogeneous, with no clear evidence to support a relation between SES and childhood leukaemia; (2) a number of factors, most importantly selection bias, might explain inconsistencies between studies; (3) there is some support for an association between SES at birth (rather than later in childhood) and childhood leukaemia and (4) if there are any associations, these are weak, limited to the most extreme SES groups (the 10-20% most or least deprived). This makes it unlikely that they would act as strong confounders in research addressing associations between other exposures and childhood leukaemia. Future research should minimise case and control selection bias, distinguish between different SES measures and leukaemia subtypes and consider timing of exposures and cancer outcomes.
Handle
https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/100768
Show full item
File(s)
FileFile TypeFormatSizeLicensePublisher/Copright statementContent
Adam RadiatProtDosimetry 2008.pdftextAdobe PDF132.02 KBpublisherpublished restricted
ncn261.pdftextAdobe PDF132.02 KBpublisherotherOpen
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 27ad28 [15.10. 15:21]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo