Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies
Options
BORIS DOI
Date of Publication
2012
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute
Author
Savović, J | |
Jones, He | |
Altman, Dg | |
Harris, Rj | |
Pildal, J | |
Als-Nielsen, B | |
Balk, Em | |
Gluud, C | |
Gluud, Ll | |
Ioannidis, Jpa | |
Schulz, Kf | |
Beynon, R | |
Welton, N | |
Wood, L | |
Moher, D | |
Deeks, Jj | |
Sterne, Jac |
Subject(s)
Series
Health technology assessment
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
1366-5278
Publisher
National Coordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment
Language
English
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
22989478
Description
The design of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) should incorporate characteristics (such as concealment of randomised allocation and blinding of participants and personnel) that avoid biases resulting from lack of comparability of the intervention and control groups. Empirical evidence suggests that the absence of such characteristics leads to biased intervention effect estimates, but the findings of different studies are not consistent.
File(s)
File | File Type | Format | Size | License | Publisher/Copright statement | Content | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Savovic HealthTechnolAssess 2012.pdf | text | Adobe PDF | 1.63 MB | publisher | published |