Nowacki, AndreasAndreasNowackiZhang, David Y.David Y.ZhangSarica, CanCanSaricaElias, Gavin J BGavin J BEliasBajaj, SwetaSwetaBajajFranzini, AngeloAngeloFranziniFranzini, AndreaAndreaFranziniSaryyeva, AsselAsselSaryyevaNguyen, Thuy Anh KhoaThuy Anh KhoaNguyen0000-0003-0577-5035Aziz, TipuTipuAzizKrauss, Joachim KJoachim KKraussEisner, WilhelmWilhelmEisnerLozano, Andres MAndres MLozanoGreen, Alexander LAlexander LGreenPollo, ClaudioClaudioPollo2025-01-282025-01-282025-01-03https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/195319Andreas Nowacki and David Y. Zhang contributed equally to this work.Objective The effectiveness and optimal stimulation site of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for central poststroke pain (CPSP) remain elusive. The objective of this retrospective international multicenter study was to assess clinical as well as neuroimaging-based predictors of long-term outcomes after DBS for CPSP. Methods The authors analyzed patient-based clinical and neuroimaging data of previously published and unpublished cohorts from 6 international DBS centers. DBS leads were reconstructed and normalized. A stimulation map was constructed on the basis of individual stimulation settings and associated outcomes. Furthermore, the authors projected the individual segmented stroke lesions and volumes of tissue activated (VTAs) of the stimulating electrode onto a normalized human connectome to obtain the connectivity profiles of the individual lesions and VTAs. Results The authors analyzed the data of 54 patients, of whom 15 were excluded from the final analysis due to a lack of imaging data. Among the remaining 39 patients from 6 different cohorts, the authors found 14 (35.9%) responders who were defined by pain relief of at least 50% at 12-month follow-up. Stimulation mapping identified areas in the posterior limb of the internal capsule, the sensorimotor thalamus, and the medial and intralaminar thalamus as effective for pain reduction. Baseline characteristics did not differ between responders and nonresponders. The stimulation sites of the responders showed significantly reduced structural connectivity to the sensory areas of the cerebral cortex compared to nonresponders. Conclusions This comprehensive, multicenter analysis corroborates the efficacy of DBS in treating CPSP for a relevant number of patients. The posterior limb of the internal capsule and the sensorimotor thalamus emerged as potential stimulation sweet spots. The difference in structural connectivity between responders and nonresponders may constitute a biomarker of effective stimulation that can help guide surgical planning in future well-designed prospective trials.encentral poststroke pain syndromedeep brain stimulationfunctional neurosurgerystructural connectivity600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & healtharticle10.48620/849733975271810.3171/2024.8.JNS24742