Inter-Reader Agreement for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Major Features and Final Categorization: A Subanalysis From a Prospective Multicenter Study.

Kuon Yeng Escalante, Cristina MCristina MKuon Yeng EscalanteSiu Xiao, TaniaTaniaSiu XiaoKono, YukoYukoKonoPiscaglia, FabioFabioPiscagliaWilson, Stephanie RStephanie RWilsonMedellin, AlexandraAlexandraMedellinRodgers, Shuchi KShuchi KRodgersPlanz, VirginiaVirginiaPlanzKamaya, AyaAyaKamayaFetzer, David TDavid TFetzerBerzigotti, AnnalisaAnnalisaBerzigotti0000-0003-4562-9016Sidhu, Paul SPaul SSidhuWessner, Corinne ECorinne EWessnerBradigan, KristenKristenBradiganEisenbrey, John RJohn REisenbreyForsberg, FlemmingFlemmingForsbergLyshchik, AndrejAndrejLyshchik2024-11-112024-11-112025-02https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/188861Kollektivautorenschaft Forschungsgruppe "CEUS LI-RADS Trial Group", Autorin: Iuliana-Pompilia Radu (Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine)Objectives Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is used to definitively diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients at risk. However, the user variability associated with CEUS LI-RADS has not been validated in North American and European patients. This study aims to evaluate the inter-reader agreements of CEUS LI-RADS features for, and final categorization of, HCC in patients at risk.Methods This retrospective multicenter clinical study used the database of a previous prospective multinational study, evaluating the accuracy of CEUS LI-RADS for HCC diagnosis in patients at risk. All cases were first evaluated by a site physician performing/supervising the CEUS examination. Randomly selected cases were re-evaluated by a blinded central reader. Final diagnosis was confirmed with the reference standard, which was a composite of imaging tests and histology. Cohen's kappa test was used to evaluate inter-reader agreement.Results This study included 150 liver nodules and 58.0% (87/150) were confirmed as HCC, 4.7% (7/150) non-HCC malignancies, 22.7% (34/150) had no confirmed final diagnosis, and 14.7% (22/150) were nonmalignant. Inter-reader agreements were substantial for CEUS LI-RADS categorization (κ = 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-0.71) and major features assessment (ranged κ = 0.64-0.78), LR-5 (κ = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.52-0.77), and LR-M (κ = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.44-0.90), while for LR-1 and LR-2 categorization was almost perfect (κ = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.65-1.00).Conclusion Our study reported a substantial inter-reader agreement for overall CEUS LI-RADS categorization, especially for LR-5 and LR-M, and major imaging features of HCC, further confirming CEUS LI-RADS as a valuable and reliable tool for diagnosis of HCC.enCEUSLI‐RADSagreementinter‐readerInter-Reader Agreement for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Major Features and Final Categorization: A Subanalysis From a Prospective Multicenter Study.article10.48620/761393947029510.1002/jum.16608