Freivogel, AndreasAndreasFreivogel2024-10-252024-10-252023https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/171849I address the worry that reflective equilibrium is too weak as an account of justification because it fails to let differing views converge. I take up informal aspects of convergence and operationalise them in a formal model of reflective equilibrium. This allows for exploration by the means of computer simulation. Findings show that the formal model does not yield unique outputs, but still boosts agreement. I conclude from this that reflective equilibrium is best seen as a pluralist account of justification that cannot be accused of resulting in an "anything goes" relativism.enConvergence Formal modelling Reflective equilibrium Simulation study100 - Philosophyarticle10.48350/1896253802611610.1007/s11229-023-04375-0