Canseco, Jose AJose ACansecoPaziuk, TaylorTaylorPaziukSchroeder, Gregory DGregory DSchroederDvorak, Marcel FMarcel FDvorakÖner, Cumhur FCumhur FÖnerBenneker, Lorin MLorin MBennekerVialle, EmilianoEmilianoVialleRajasekaran, ShanmuganathanShanmuganathanRajasekaranEl-Sharkawi, MohammadMohammadEl-SharkawiBransford, Richard JRichard JBransfordKanna, Rishi MRishi MKannaHolas, MartinMartinHolasMuijs, SanderSanderMuijsPopescu, Eugen CezarEugen CezarPopescuDandurand, CharlotteCharlotteDandurandTee, Jin WJin WTeeCamino-Willhuber, GastonGastonCamino-WillhuberAly, Mohamed MMohamed MAlyJoaquim, Andrei FernandesAndrei FernandesJoaquimKeynan, OryOryKeynanChhabra, Harvinder SinghHarvinder SinghChhabraBigdon, SebastianSebastianBigdonSpiegl, Ulrich JUlrich JSpieglSchnake, KlausKlausSchnakeVaccaro, Alexander RAlexander RVaccaro2024-10-262024-10-262024-02https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/174239STUDY DESIGN Reliability study utilizing 183 injury CT scans by 22 spine trauma experts with assessment of radiographic features, classification of injuries and treatment recommendations. OBJECTIVES To assess the reliability of the AOSpine TL Injury Classification System (TLICS) including the categories within the classification and the M1 modifier. METHODS Kappa and Intraclass correlation coefficients were produced. Associations of various imaging characteristics (comminution, PLC status) and treatment recommendations were analyzed through regression analysis. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used for making predictive algorithms. RESULTS Reliability of the AO Spine TLICS at differentiating A3 and A4 injuries (N = 71) (K = .466; 95% CI .458 - .474; P < .001) demonstrated moderate agreement. Similarly, the average intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) amongst A3 and A4 injuries was excellent (ICC = .934; 95% CI .919 - .947; P < .001) and the ICC between individual measures was moderate (ICC = .403; 95% CI .351 - .461; P < .001). The overall agreement on the utilization of the M1 modifier amongst A3 and A4 injuries was fair (K = .161; 95% CI .151 - .171; P < .001). The ICC for PLC status in A3 and A4 injuries averaged across all measures was excellent (ICC = .936; 95% CI .922 - .949; P < .001). The M1 modifier suggests respondents are nearly 40% more confident that the PLC is injured amongst all injuries. The M1 modifier was employed at a higher frequency as injuries were classified higher in the classification system. CONCLUSIONS The reliability of surgeons differentiating between A3 and A4 injuries in the AOSpine TLICS is substantial and the utilization of the M1 modifier occurs more frequently with higher grades in the system.enAO spine thoracolumbar injury classification reliability thoracolumbar fractures600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & healtharticle10.48350/1926673832460010.1177/21925682231202371