• LOGIN
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publication
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • LOGIN
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Reproducibility and day time bias correction of optoelectronic leg volumetry: a prospective cohort study
 

Reproducibility and day time bias correction of optoelectronic leg volumetry: a prospective cohort study

Options
  • Details
BORIS DOI
10.7892/boris.4281
Date of Publication
2011
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute

Universitätsklinik fü...

Universitätsklinik fü...

Author
Engelberger, Rolf P
Blazek, Claudia Rosa
Universitätsklinik für Dermatologie
Amsler, Felix
Keo, Hong H
Baumann, Frédéric
Blättler, Werner
Baumgartner, Iris
Universitätsklinik für Angiologie
Willenberg, Torsten
Series
BMC Medical research methodology
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
1471-2288
Publisher
BioMed Central
Language
English
Publisher DOI
10.1186/1471-2288-11-138
PubMed ID
21974893
Description
Background

Leg edema is a common manifestation of various underlying pathologies. Reliable measurement tools are required to quantify edema and monitor therapeutic interventions. Aim of the present work was to investigate the reproducibility of optoelectronic leg volumetry over 3 weeks' time period and to eliminate daytime related within-individual variability.
Methods

Optoelectronic leg volumetry was performed in 63 hairdressers (mean age 45 ± 16 years, 85.7% female) in standing position twice within a minute for each leg and repeated after 3 weeks. Both lower leg (legBD) and whole limb (limbBF) volumetry were analysed. Reproducibility was expressed as analytical and within-individual coefficients of variance (CVA, CVW), and as intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC).
Results

A total of 492 leg volume measurements were analysed. Both legBD and limbBF volumetry were highly reproducible with CVA of 0.5% and 0.7%, respectively. Within-individual reproducibility of legBD and limbBF volumetry over a three weeks' period was high (CVW 1.3% for both; ICC 0.99 for both). At both visits, the second measurement revealed a significantly higher volume compared to the first measurement with a mean increase of 7.3 ml ± 14.1 (0.33% ± 0.58%) for legBD and 30.1 ml ± 48.5 ml (0.52% ± 0.79%) for limbBF volume. A significant linear correlation between absolute and relative leg volume differences and the difference of exact day time of measurement between the two study visits was found (P < .001). A therefore determined time-correction formula permitted further improvement of CVW.
Conclusions

Leg volume changes can be reliably assessed by optoelectronic leg volumetry at a single time point and over a 3 weeks' time period. However, volumetry results are biased by orthostatic and daytime-related volume changes. The bias for day-time related volume changes can be minimized by a time-correction formula.
Handle
https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/74946
Show full item
File(s)
FileFile TypeFormatSizeLicensePublisher/Copright statementContent
1471-2288-11-138.pdftextAdobe PDF245.4 KBpublishedOpen
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: d1c7f7 [27.06. 13:56]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo