• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Screening and treatment to prevent sequelae in women with Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection: how much do we know?
 

Screening and treatment to prevent sequelae in women with Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection: how much do we know?

Options
  • Details
BORIS DOI
10.7892/boris.1325
Date of Publication
2010
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute

Institut für Sozial- ...

Contributor
Gottlieb, Sami L
Berman, Stuart M
Low, Nicolaorcid-logo
Institut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
Series
Journal of infectious diseases
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
0022-1899
Publisher
The University of Chicago Press
Language
English
Publisher DOI
10.1086/652396
PubMed ID
20470051
Description
Background. An important question for chlamydia control programs is the extent to which finding and treating prevalent, asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection reduces reproductive sequelae in infected women.

Methods. We reviewed the literature to critically evaluate evidence on the effect of chlamydia screening on development of sequelae in infected women.

Results. Two randomized controlled trials of 1-time screening for chlamydial infection—in a Seattle-area health maintenance organization and a Danish school district—revealed that screening was associated with an ∼50% reduction in the incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease over the following year. However, both of these trials had methodological issues that may have affected the magnitude of observed screening benefits and might limit generalizability to other populations. A large, nonrandomized cohort of chlamydia screening among US Army recruits, although limited by lack of outpatient data, did not find a benefit of similar magnitude to the randomized trials. Methodological limitations restrict valid conclusions about individual benefits of screening using data from historical cohorts and ecological studies. We identified no trials directly evaluating the effect of chlamydia screening on subclinical tubal inflammation or damage, ectopic pregnancy, or tubal factor infertility and no studies addressing the effects of >1 round of screening, the optimal frequency of screening, or the benefits of screening for repeat infections.

Conclusions. Additional studies of the effectiveness of chlamydia screening would be valuable; feasible study designs may depend on the degree to which screening programs are already established. In addition, better natural history data on the timing of tubal inflammation and damage after C. trachomatis infection and development of more accurate, noninvasive tools to assess chlamydial sequelae are essential to informing chlamydia control efforts.
Handle
https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/72065
Show full item
File(s)
FileFile TypeFormatSizeLicensePublisher/Copright statementContent
Gottlieb JInfectDis 2010.pdftextAdobe PDF303.75 KBpublisherpublished restricted
201-Supplement_2-S156.pdftextAdobe PDF314.01 KBpublisherotherOpen
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 396f6f [24.09. 11:22]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo