Comprehensive Laboratory Diagnostic Workup for Patients with Suspected Intraocular Lymphoma including Flow Cytometry, Molecular Genetics and Cytopathology.
Options
BORIS DOI
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
35200564
Description
BACKGROUND
Intraocular lymphoma (IOL) presents a real challenge in daily diagnostics. Cyto- and/or histopathology of vitreous body represent the diagnostic cornerstones. Yet, false negative results remain common. Therefore, we analyzed the diagnostic significance of flow cytometry (FC) within the workup algorithm of IOL and compared its sensitivity with the results obtained from routine cytopathology and molecular genetics; Methods: Seven patients undergoing vitrectomy due to suspected IOL were investigated by FC and parallel cytopathology and, if available, digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) for MYD88 L265P; Results: Four out of seven patients were finally diagnosed with IOL. Among the IOL patients, cytopathology confirmed the presence of lymphoma cells in only two cases. In contrast, FC was positive for IOL in all four cases, and FC additionally confirmed the lack of IOL in the remaining patients. In IOL patients diagnosed by FC and with available ddPCR, the diagnosis of IOL was confirmed by the presence of the MYD88 L265P mutation in all three patients; Conclusions: The combination with FC was superior to cytopathology alone in the diagnostic work-up of IOL, and it showed an excellent correlation with ddPCR results. A comprehensive diagnostic panel consisting of cytopathology, FC and molecular genetics should be considered for the work-up of suspected IOL.
Intraocular lymphoma (IOL) presents a real challenge in daily diagnostics. Cyto- and/or histopathology of vitreous body represent the diagnostic cornerstones. Yet, false negative results remain common. Therefore, we analyzed the diagnostic significance of flow cytometry (FC) within the workup algorithm of IOL and compared its sensitivity with the results obtained from routine cytopathology and molecular genetics; Methods: Seven patients undergoing vitrectomy due to suspected IOL were investigated by FC and parallel cytopathology and, if available, digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) for MYD88 L265P; Results: Four out of seven patients were finally diagnosed with IOL. Among the IOL patients, cytopathology confirmed the presence of lymphoma cells in only two cases. In contrast, FC was positive for IOL in all four cases, and FC additionally confirmed the lack of IOL in the remaining patients. In IOL patients diagnosed by FC and with available ddPCR, the diagnosis of IOL was confirmed by the presence of the MYD88 L265P mutation in all three patients; Conclusions: The combination with FC was superior to cytopathology alone in the diagnostic work-up of IOL, and it showed an excellent correlation with ddPCR results. A comprehensive diagnostic panel consisting of cytopathology, FC and molecular genetics should be considered for the work-up of suspected IOL.
Date of Publication
2022-01-31
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
500 - Science::570 - Life sciences; biology
Keyword(s)
MYD88 cytopathology flow cytometry intraocular lymphoma molecular genetics vitreous body
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Shumilov, Evgenii | |
Mazzeo, Paolo | |
Haase, Detlef | |
Lenz, Georg |
Additional Credits
Institut für Pathologie
Universitätsklinik für Medizinische Onkologie
Universitätsklinik für Hämatologie und Hämatologisches Zentrallabor
Universitätsklinik für Augenheilkunde
Series
Current oncology
Publisher
MDPI
ISSN
1718-7729
Access(Rights)
open.access