Time-efficient consultation hours in the department of gynecological endocrinology.
Options
BORIS DOI
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
39217621
Description
Background
The aim was to conduct a benchmark pilot study to find the best practice for consultation hours in the field of gynecological endocrinology. Suitable benchmarking participants were found in China, Germany, Greece, and Switzerland. Specifically, the study aimed to find the most time-efficient and beneficial consultation type in gynecological endocrinology focused on menopause and whether a shorter face-to-face consultation correlates with lower patient satisfaction.Methods
This was an observational study. To analyze the processes of all benchmarking participants three tools were used: a measurement of time needed for the different consultation types, a questionnaire for patients and one for physicians. The primary endpoint was the time measurement of first consultations. Secondary endpoints were the time measurements of follow-up consultations and phone consultations and patient satisfaction.Results
The mean overall duration of a first consultation differed from 20.4 min to 39.7 min ( = 0.003), mainly based on differences of the mean time to acquire the patient history, 5.6 to 21.6 min ( < 0.001). The percentage of patients who felt they had enough time to discuss questions ranged from 70% to 100% ( < 0.001). The percentage of patients who felt fully understood by their physician ranged from 62.5% to 92% ( = 0.006). The duration of a first consultation did not correlate with patients feeling well consulted (r=-0.048, = 0.557).Conclusions
A concise patient history that concentrates on the most relevant points can reduce the total consultation time. Reducing consultation time can be made without compromising how well patients feel consulted.
The aim was to conduct a benchmark pilot study to find the best practice for consultation hours in the field of gynecological endocrinology. Suitable benchmarking participants were found in China, Germany, Greece, and Switzerland. Specifically, the study aimed to find the most time-efficient and beneficial consultation type in gynecological endocrinology focused on menopause and whether a shorter face-to-face consultation correlates with lower patient satisfaction.Methods
This was an observational study. To analyze the processes of all benchmarking participants three tools were used: a measurement of time needed for the different consultation types, a questionnaire for patients and one for physicians. The primary endpoint was the time measurement of first consultations. Secondary endpoints were the time measurements of follow-up consultations and phone consultations and patient satisfaction.Results
The mean overall duration of a first consultation differed from 20.4 min to 39.7 min ( = 0.003), mainly based on differences of the mean time to acquire the patient history, 5.6 to 21.6 min ( < 0.001). The percentage of patients who felt they had enough time to discuss questions ranged from 70% to 100% ( < 0.001). The percentage of patients who felt fully understood by their physician ranged from 62.5% to 92% ( = 0.006). The duration of a first consultation did not correlate with patients feeling well consulted (r=-0.048, = 0.557).Conclusions
A concise patient history that concentrates on the most relevant points can reduce the total consultation time. Reducing consultation time can be made without compromising how well patients feel consulted.
Date of Publication
2024-12
Publication Type
Article
Keyword(s)
Benchmark
•
best practice
•
duration of consultation
•
patient satisfaction
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Sourouni, Marina | |
Bitterlich, Norman | |
Blickenstorfer, Kerstin | |
Bühling, Kai J | |
Lambrinoudaki, Irene | |
Ruan, Xiangyan | |
Schaudig, Katrin |
Additional Credits
Clinic of Gynaecology
Series
Gynecological Endocrinology
Publisher
Taylor and Francis Group
ISSN
0951-3590
Access(Rights)
open.access