Hybrid closed‐loop glucose control with faster insulin aspart (Fiasp) compared with standard insulin aspart in adults with type 1 diabetes: a double‐blind, multicentre, multinational, randomised, crossover study
Options
BORIS DOI
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
33606901
Description
Objective: We evaluated hybrid closed-loop glucose control with faster-acting insulin aspart (Fiasp) in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). We hypothesised that closed-loop with Fiasp provides similar efficacy as closed-loop with standard insulin aspart.
Research design and methods: In a double-blind, multinational, randomised, crossover study, 25 adults with T1D using insulin pump therapy (mean ± SD, age 38 ± 9 years, HbA1c 7.4 ± 0.8% [57 ± 8 mmol/mol]) underwent two 8-week periods of unrestricted living comparing hybrid closed-loop with Fiasp and hybrid closed-loop with standard insulin aspart in random order. During both interventions, the CamAPS FX closed-loop system incorporating Cambridge model predictive control algorithm was used.
Results: In an intention-to-treat analysis, the proportion of time sensor glucose was in target range (3.9-10.0 mmol/L; primary endpoint) was not different between interventions (75 ± 8% vs. 75 ± 8% for hybrid closed-loop with Fiasp vs. hybrid closed-loop with standard insulin aspart; mean-adjusted difference - 0.6 [95%CI -1.8 to 0.7%]; P < 0.001 for non-inferiority [non-inferiority margin 5%]). The proportion of time with sensor glucose <3.9 mmol/L (median [IQR] 2.4 [1.2-3.2%] vs. 2.9 [1.7-4.0%]; P = 0.01) and < 3.0 mmol/L (median [IQR] 0.4 [0.2-0.7%] vs. 0.7 [0.2-0.9%]; P = 0.03) was reduced with Fiasp vs. standard insulin aspart. There was no difference in mean glucose (8.1 ± 0.8 vs. 8.0 ± 0.8 mmol/L; P = 0.13) or glucose variability (SD of sensor glucose 2.9 ± 0.5 vs. 2.9 ± 0.5 mmol/L; P = 0.90). Total daily insulin requirements did not differ (49 ± 15 vs. 49 ± 15 units/day; P = 0.45). No severe hypoglycaemia or ketoacidosis occurred.
Conclusions: The use of Fiasp in CamAPS FX closed-loop system may reduce hypoglycaemia without compromising glucose control compared to standard insulin aspart in adults with T1D. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Research design and methods: In a double-blind, multinational, randomised, crossover study, 25 adults with T1D using insulin pump therapy (mean ± SD, age 38 ± 9 years, HbA1c 7.4 ± 0.8% [57 ± 8 mmol/mol]) underwent two 8-week periods of unrestricted living comparing hybrid closed-loop with Fiasp and hybrid closed-loop with standard insulin aspart in random order. During both interventions, the CamAPS FX closed-loop system incorporating Cambridge model predictive control algorithm was used.
Results: In an intention-to-treat analysis, the proportion of time sensor glucose was in target range (3.9-10.0 mmol/L; primary endpoint) was not different between interventions (75 ± 8% vs. 75 ± 8% for hybrid closed-loop with Fiasp vs. hybrid closed-loop with standard insulin aspart; mean-adjusted difference - 0.6 [95%CI -1.8 to 0.7%]; P < 0.001 for non-inferiority [non-inferiority margin 5%]). The proportion of time with sensor glucose <3.9 mmol/L (median [IQR] 2.4 [1.2-3.2%] vs. 2.9 [1.7-4.0%]; P = 0.01) and < 3.0 mmol/L (median [IQR] 0.4 [0.2-0.7%] vs. 0.7 [0.2-0.9%]; P = 0.03) was reduced with Fiasp vs. standard insulin aspart. There was no difference in mean glucose (8.1 ± 0.8 vs. 8.0 ± 0.8 mmol/L; P = 0.13) or glucose variability (SD of sensor glucose 2.9 ± 0.5 vs. 2.9 ± 0.5 mmol/L; P = 0.90). Total daily insulin requirements did not differ (49 ± 15 vs. 49 ± 15 units/day; P = 0.45). No severe hypoglycaemia or ketoacidosis occurred.
Conclusions: The use of Fiasp in CamAPS FX closed-loop system may reduce hypoglycaemia without compromising glucose control compared to standard insulin aspart in adults with T1D. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Date of Publication
2021-06
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Boughton, Charlotte K | |
Hartnell, Sara | |
Thabit, Hood | |
Poettler, Tina | |
Wilinska, Malgorzata E | |
Ashcroft, Nicole L | |
Sibayan, Judy | |
Cohen, Nathan | |
Calhoun, Peter | |
Mader, Julia K | |
Evans, Mark | |
Leelarathna, Lalantha | |
Hovorka, Roman |
Series
Diabetes, obesity and metabolism
Publisher
Wiley
ISSN
1462-8902
Access(Rights)
open.access