• LOGIN
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publication
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • LOGIN
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Electrophysiology Testing to Stratify Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.
 

Electrophysiology Testing to Stratify Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Options
  • Details
BORIS DOI
10.7892/boris.147590
Date of Publication
March 3, 2020
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute

Universitätsklinik fü...

Author
Knecht, Sven
Schaer, Beat
Reichlin, Tobias Romanorcid-logo
Universitätsklinik für Kardiologie
Spies, Florian
Madaffari, Antonio
Vischer, Annina
Fahrni, Gregor
Jeger, Raban
Kaiser, Christoph
Osswald, Stefan
Sticherling, Christian
Kühne, Michael
Subject(s)

600 - Technology::610...

Series
Journal of the American Heart Association
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
2047-9980
Publisher
American Heart Association
Language
English
Publisher DOI
10.1161/JAHA.119.014446
PubMed ID
32089049
Uncontrolled Keywords

electrophysiology stu...

Description
Background Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is common after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and is an indicator of subsequent high-grade atrioventricular block (HAVB). No standardized protocol is available to identify LBBB patients at risk for HAVB. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an electrophysiology study tailored strategy in patients with LBBB after TAVI. Methods and Results We prospectively analyzed consecutive patients with LBBB after TAVI. An electrophysiology study was performed to measure the HV-interval the day following TAVI. In patients with normal His-ventricular (HV)-interval ≤55 ms, a loop recorder was implanted (ILR-group), whereas pacemaker implantation was performed in patients with prolonged HV-interval >55 ms (PM-group). The primary end point was occurrence of HAVB during a follow-up of 12 months. Secondary end points were symptoms, hospitalizations, adverse events because of device implantation or electrophysiology study, and death. Of 373 patients screened after TAVI, 56 patients (82±6 years, 41% male) with LBBB were included. HAVB occurred in 4 of 41 patients (10%) in the ILR-group and in 8 of 15 patients (53%) in the PM-group (P<0.001). We did not identify other predictors for HAVB than the HV interval. The negative predictive value for the cut-off of HV 55 ms to detect HAVB was 90%. No HAVB-related syncope occurred in the 2 groups. Conclusions An electrophysiology study tailored strategy to LBBB after TAVI with a cut-off of HV >55 ms is a feasible and safe approach to stratify patients with regard to developing HAVB during a follow-up of 12 months.
Handle
https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/37714
Show full item
File(s)
FileFile TypeFormatSizeLicensePublisher/Copright statementContent
JAHA.119.014446.pdfAdobe PDF338.29 KBAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)publishedOpen
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: d1c7f7 [27.06. 13:56]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo