Invasive disease-free and overall survival after (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer treated with upfront letrozole: Experiences from the phase IV PreFace trial.
Options
BORIS DOI
Date of Publication
July 11, 2025
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute
Contributor
Beierlein, Milena | |
Häberle, Lothar | |
Nabieva, Naiba | |
Maass, Nicolai | |
Aktas, Bahriye | |
Kümmel, Sherko | |
Thomssen, Christoph | |
Wolf, Christopher | |
Kolberg, Hans-Christian | |
Brucker, Cosima | |
Janni, Wolfgang | |
Dall, Peter | |
Schneeweiss, Andreas | |
Marme, Frederik | |
Sütterlin, Marc W | |
Ruebner, Matthias | |
Theuser, Anna-Katharin | |
Hofmann, Nadine M | |
Böhm, Sybille | |
Almstedt, Katrin | |
Kellner, Sara | |
Gass, Paul | |
Lück, Hans-Joachim | |
Hein, Alexander | |
Schmatloch, Sabine | |
Kalder, Matthias | |
Uleer, Christoph | |
Juhasz-Böss, Ingolf | |
Hanf, Volker | |
Jackisch, Christian | |
Müller, Volkmar | |
Rack, Brigitte | |
Belleville, Erik | |
Wallwiener, Diethelm | |
Rody, Achim | |
Bayer, Chistian M | |
Uhrig, Sabrina | |
Huebner, Hanna | |
Goossens, Chloë | |
Brucker, Sara Y | |
Hack, Carolin C | |
Fehm, Tanja N | |
Fasching, Peter A |
Subject(s)
Series
International Journal of Cancer
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
1097-0215
0020-7136
Publisher
Wiley
Language
English
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
40641449
Description
Patients with hormone receptor-positive (HRpos), HER2-negative (HER2neg) breast cancer (BC) benefit less from neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) than patients with triple-negative and HER2-positive BC. In this retrospective analysis of the phase IV PreFace clinical trial (NCT01908556), where postmenopausal HRpos BC patients (n = 3297) were treated with 5-year upfront adjuvant letrozole therapy, we evaluated the prognosis of patients treated with adjuvant versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HRpos/HER2neg early-stage BC. HRpos/HER2neg patients with information on (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 2895) were retrospectively selected from all patients enrolled in the PreFace trial. Invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between patient groups that were treated with neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was given to 1051 patients (36.3% of all patients), of which 874 (83.2%) received adjuvant chemotherapy and 177 (16.8%) NACT. Pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in the NACT group was 6.9%. Patients treated with NACT had a worse outcome than those treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (5-year iDFS rate 81% vs. 88%; 5-year OS rate 89% vs. 93%). This effect was maintained after adjusting for age, BMI, lymph node status, grading, tumor size, and histology (hazard ratio for iDFS: 1.95 (95%CI: 1.28-2.95); hazard ratio for OS: 2.13 (95%CI: 1.24-3.66)). Further adjustment for taxane-based regimes did not alter results. In conclusion, in this retrospective analysis of patients with early-stage HRpos/HER2neg BC, patients with NACT had a more unfavorable prognosis than patients treated adjuvantly, independent of patient and tumor characteristics. Prognosis of neoadjuvant patients might be affected by resistance mechanisms, warranting further investigation.
File(s)
| File | File Type | Format | Size | License | Publisher/Copright statement | Content | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intl Journal of Cancer - 2025 - Beierlein - Invasive disease‐free and overall survival after neo adjuvant chemotherapy in.pdf | text | Adobe PDF | 1.5 MB | published |