First international external quality assessment of molecular diagnostics for Mers-CoV
Options
BORIS DOI
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
26209385
Description
BACKGROUND:
Since the discovery of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in 2012, diagnostic protocols were quickly published and deployed globally.
OBJECTIVES:
We set out to assess the quality of MERS-CoV molecular diagnostics worldwide.
STUDY DESIGN:
Both sensitivity and specificity were assessed using 12 samples containing different viral loads of MERS-CoV or common coronaviruses (OC43, 229E, NL63, HKU1).
RESULTS:
The panel was sent to more than 106 participants, of which 99 laboratories from 6 continents returned 189 panel results.Scores ranged from 100% (84 laboratories) to 33% (1 laboratory). 15% of respondents reported quantitative results, 61% semi-quantitative (Ct-values or time to positivity) and 24% reported qualitative results. The major specific technique used was real-time RT-PCR using the WHO recommended targets upE, ORF1a and ORF1b. The evaluation confirmed that RT-PCRs targeting the ORF1b are less sensitive, and therefore not advised for primary diagnostics.
CONCLUSIONS:
The first external quality assessment MERS-CoV panel gives a good insight in molecular diagnostic techniques and their performances for sensitive and specific detection of MERS-CoV RNA globally. Overall, all laboratories were capable of detecting MERS-CoV with some differences in sensitivity. The observation that 8% of laboratories reported false MERS-CoV positive single assay results shows room for improvement, and the importance of using confirmatory targets.
Since the discovery of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in 2012, diagnostic protocols were quickly published and deployed globally.
OBJECTIVES:
We set out to assess the quality of MERS-CoV molecular diagnostics worldwide.
STUDY DESIGN:
Both sensitivity and specificity were assessed using 12 samples containing different viral loads of MERS-CoV or common coronaviruses (OC43, 229E, NL63, HKU1).
RESULTS:
The panel was sent to more than 106 participants, of which 99 laboratories from 6 continents returned 189 panel results.Scores ranged from 100% (84 laboratories) to 33% (1 laboratory). 15% of respondents reported quantitative results, 61% semi-quantitative (Ct-values or time to positivity) and 24% reported qualitative results. The major specific technique used was real-time RT-PCR using the WHO recommended targets upE, ORF1a and ORF1b. The evaluation confirmed that RT-PCRs targeting the ORF1b are less sensitive, and therefore not advised for primary diagnostics.
CONCLUSIONS:
The first external quality assessment MERS-CoV panel gives a good insight in molecular diagnostic techniques and their performances for sensitive and specific detection of MERS-CoV RNA globally. Overall, all laboratories were capable of detecting MERS-CoV with some differences in sensitivity. The observation that 8% of laboratories reported false MERS-CoV positive single assay results shows room for improvement, and the importance of using confirmatory targets.
Date of Publication
2015
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
Keyword(s)
Diagnosis
•
EQA
•
MERS-CoV
•
Molecular
•
QPCR
•
Quality control
•
Real-time RT-PCR
•
Viral load
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Pas, Suzan D. | |
Patel, Pranav | |
Reusken, Chantal | |
Domingo, Cristina | |
Corman, Victor M. | |
Drosten, Christian | |
Nowotny, Norbert | |
Koopmans, Marion P.G. | |
Niedrig, Matthias |
Additional Credits
Series
Journal of clinical virology
Publisher
Elsevier
ISSN
1386-6532
Access(Rights)
open.access