Wide Restorative Emergence Angle Increases Marginal Bone Loss and Impairs Integrity of the Junctional Epithelium of the Implant Supracrestal Complex: A Preclinical Study.
Options
BORIS DOI
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
39385502
Description
Aim
To assess the influence of the emergence angle on marginal bone loss (MBL) and supracrestal soft tissue around dental implants.Materials And Methods
In six mongrel dogs, the mandibular premolars and molars were extracted. After 3 months of healing, four dental implants were placed in each hemimandible. The implants were randomly allocated to receive one of four customized healing abutments, each with a different value of the restorative emergence angle: 20°, 40°, 60° or 80°. Intra-oral radiographs were taken after placing the healing abutments and at 6, 9, 16 and 24 weeks of follow-up. Then, micro-CT and undecalcified histology and synchrotron were performed. MBL over time was analysed with generalized estimating equations (GEEs) and adjusted for baseline soft-tissue thickness.Results
From implant placement to 24 weeks, GEE modelling showed that the MBL at mesial and distal sites consistently increased over time, indicating MBL in all groups (p < 0.001). The model indicated that MBL varied significantly across the different restorative angles (angle effect, p < 0.001), with 80° showing the greatest bone loss. Micro-CT, histology and synchrotron confirmed the corresponding trends and showed that wide restorative angles (60° and 80°) impaired the integrity of the junctional epithelium of the supracrestal tissue.Conclusions
A wide restorative angle increases MBL and impairs the integrity of the junctional epithelium of the implant supracrestal complex.
To assess the influence of the emergence angle on marginal bone loss (MBL) and supracrestal soft tissue around dental implants.Materials And Methods
In six mongrel dogs, the mandibular premolars and molars were extracted. After 3 months of healing, four dental implants were placed in each hemimandible. The implants were randomly allocated to receive one of four customized healing abutments, each with a different value of the restorative emergence angle: 20°, 40°, 60° or 80°. Intra-oral radiographs were taken after placing the healing abutments and at 6, 9, 16 and 24 weeks of follow-up. Then, micro-CT and undecalcified histology and synchrotron were performed. MBL over time was analysed with generalized estimating equations (GEEs) and adjusted for baseline soft-tissue thickness.Results
From implant placement to 24 weeks, GEE modelling showed that the MBL at mesial and distal sites consistently increased over time, indicating MBL in all groups (p < 0.001). The model indicated that MBL varied significantly across the different restorative angles (angle effect, p < 0.001), with 80° showing the greatest bone loss. Micro-CT, histology and synchrotron confirmed the corresponding trends and showed that wide restorative angles (60° and 80°) impaired the integrity of the junctional epithelium of the supracrestal tissue.Conclusions
A wide restorative angle increases MBL and impairs the integrity of the junctional epithelium of the implant supracrestal complex.
Date of Publication
2024-12
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
Keyword(s)
CAD/CAM
•
dental implant
•
dental implant‐abutment design
•
emergence profile
•
histology
•
prosthodontics
•
restorative angle
•
titanium abutments
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Strauss, Franz J | |
Park, Jin-Young | |
Lee, Jung-Seok | |
Schiavon, Lucia | |
Smirani, Rawen | |
Hitz, Sonja | |
Chantler, Jennifer G M | |
Mattheos, Nikos | |
Jung, Ronald | |
Cha, Jae-Kook | |
Thoma, Daniel |
Additional Credits
School of Dental Medicine, Clinic of Periodontology
Series
Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
ISSN
0303-6979
Access(Rights)
open.access