• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Projects
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Indwelling catheter vs intermittent catheterization: is there a difference in UTI susceptibility?
 

Indwelling catheter vs intermittent catheterization: is there a difference in UTI susceptibility?

Options
  • Details
  • Files
BORIS DOI
10.48350/185194
Publisher DOI
10.1186/s12879-023-08475-7
PubMed ID
37533010
Description
BACKGROUND

Patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) often rely on some type of catheterization for bladder emptying. Intermittent catheterization (IC) is considered the gold standard and is preferred over continuous catheterization, since it is considered to cause fewer urinary tract infections (UTIs) than indwelling catheterization. The main objective of our study was to describe UTI prevalence (at visit) and incidence (within the last 12 months) and urine culture characteristics between patients using an indwelling catheter versus (vs) those performing IC.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we prospectively evaluated from 02/2020 to 01/2021 patients with NLUTD undergoing urine cultures for prophylactic reasons or due to UTI symptoms. At visit, all patients underwent a standardized interview on current UTI symptoms as well as UTI history and antibiotic consumption within the past year. Patients using an indwelling catheter (n = 206) or IC (n = 299) were included in the analysis. The main outcome was between-group differences regarding UTI characteristics.

RESULTS

Patients using an indwelling catheter were older (indwelling catheter vs IC: median 66 (Q1-Q3: 55-77) vs 55 (42-67) years of age) and showed a higher Charlson comorbidity index (indwelling catheter vs IC: median 4 (Q1-Q3: 2-6) vs 2 (1-4) (both p < 0·001). A total of 40 patients from both groups were diagnosed with a UTI at visit (indwelling catheters vs IC: 8% (16/206) vs 8% (24/299); p = 0·782), and the number of UTIs within the past 12 months was not significantly different between groups. Overall, Escherichia coli (21%), Enterococcus faecalis (17%), and Klebsiella spp. (12%) were the most frequently detected bacteria.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of patients with NLUTD, we did not find relevant differences in UTI frequency between groups. These results suggest that UTI-related concerns should not be given undue emphasis when counseling patients for catheter-related bladder emptying methods.
Date of Publication
2023-08-02
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
Keyword(s)
Asymptomatic bacteriuria Indwelling catheter Intermittent catheterization Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction Urinary tract infection
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Neumeier, Vera
Stangl, Fabian Peter
Universitätsklinik für Urologie
Borer, Joëlle
Anderson, Collene E
Birkhäuser, Veronika
Chemych, Oksana
Gross, Oliver
Koschorke, Miriam
Marschall, Jonas
McCallin, Shawna
Mehnert, Ulrich
Sadri, Helen
Stächele, Lara
Kessler, Thomas M
Leitner, Lorenz
Additional Credits
Universitätsklinik für Urologie
Series
BMC infectious diseases
Publisher
BioMed Central
ISSN
1471-2334
Access(Rights)
open.access
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: ae9592 [15.12. 16:43]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo