• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Theses
  • Research Data
  • Projects
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • More
  • Statistics
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: The Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference APCCC 2017.
 

Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: The Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference APCCC 2017.

Options
  • Details
  • Files
BORIS DOI
10.7892/boris.111271
Publisher DOI
10.1016/j.eururo.2017.06.002
PubMed ID
28655541
Description
BACKGROUND

In advanced prostate cancer (APC), successful drug development as well as advances in imaging and molecular characterisation have resulted in multiple areas where there is lack of evidence or low level of evidence. The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2017 addressed some of these topics.

OBJECTIVE

To present the report of APCCC 2017.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Ten important areas of controversy in APC management were identified: high-risk localised and locally advanced prostate cancer; "oligometastatic" prostate cancer; castration-naïve and castration-resistant prostate cancer; the role of imaging in APC; osteoclast-targeted therapy; molecular characterisation of blood and tissue; genetic counselling/testing; side effects of systemic treatment(s); global access to prostate cancer drugs. A panel of 60 international prostate cancer experts developed the program and the consensus questions.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The panel voted publicly but anonymously on 150 predefined questions, which have been developed following a modified Delphi process.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Voting is based on panellist opinion, and thus is not based on a standard literature review or meta-analysis. The outcomes of the voting had varying degrees of support, as reflected in the wording of this article, as well as in the detailed voting results recorded in Supplementary data.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented expert voting results can be used for support in areas of management of men with APC where there is no high-level evidence, but individualised treatment decisions should as always be based on all of the data available, including disease extent and location, prior therapies regardless of type, host factors including comorbidities, as well as patient preferences, current and emerging evidence, and logistical and economic constraints. Inclusion of men with APC in clinical trials should be strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2017 again identified important areas in need of trials specifically designed to address them.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The second Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference APCCC 2017 did provide a forum for discussion and debates on current treatment options for men with advanced prostate cancer. The aim of the conference is to bring the expertise of world experts to care givers around the world who see less patients with prostate cancer. The conference concluded with a discussion and voting of the expert panel on predefined consensus questions, targeting areas of primary clinical relevance. The results of these expert opinion votes are embedded in the clinical context of current treatment of men with advanced prostate cancer and provide a practical guide to clinicians to assist in the discussions with men with prostate cancer as part of a shared and multidisciplinary decision-making process.
Date of Publication
2018-02
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
Keyword(s)
Advanced and high-risk localized prostate cancer Castration-naive and castration-resistant prostate cancer Consensus Oligometastatic prostate cancer Therapeutics
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Gillessen, Silke
Attard, Gerhardt
Beer, Tomasz M
Beltran, Himisha
Bossi, Alberto
Bristow, Rob
Carver, Brett
Castellano, Daniel
Chung, Byung Ha
Clarke, Noel
Daugaard, Gedske
Davis, Ian D
de Bono, Johann
Borges Dos Reis, Rodolfo
Drake, Charles G
Eeles, Ros
Efstathiou, Eleni
Evans, Christopher P
Fanti, Stefano
Feng, Felix
Fizazi, Karim
Frydenberg, Mark
Gleave, Martin
Halabi, Susan
Heidenreich, Axel
Higano, Celestia S
James, Nicolas
Kantoff, Philip
Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, Pirkko-Liisa
Khauli, Raja B
Kramer, Gero
Logothetis, Chris
Maluf, Fernando
Morgans, Alicia K
Morris, Michael J
Mottet, Nicolas
Murthy, Vedang
Oh, William
Ost, Piet
Padhani, Anwar R
Parker, Chris
Pritchard, Colin C
Roach, Mack
Rubin, Mark Andrew
Department for BioMedical Research, Forschungsgruppe Präzisionsonkologie
Ryan, Charles
Saad, Fred
Sartor, Oliver
Scher, Howard
Sella, Avishay
Shore, Neal
Smith, Matthew
Soule, Howard
Sternberg, Cora N
Suzuki, Hiroyoshi
Sweeney, Christopher
Sydes, Matthew R
Tannock, Ian
Tombal, Bertrand
Valdagni, Riccardo
Wiegel, Thomas
Omlin, Aurelius Gabriel
Universitätsklinik für Medizinische Onkologie
Additional Credits
Department for BioMedical Research, Forschungsgruppe Präzisionsonkologie
Universitätsklinik für Medizinische Onkologie
Series
European urology
Publisher
Elsevier
ISSN
0302-2838
Access(Rights)
open.access
Show full item
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 9f4e9a [ 5.02. 18:48]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Audiovisual Material
  • Software & other digital items
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo