• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. PCI Strategies in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.
 

PCI Strategies in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.

Options
  • Details
BORIS DOI
10.7892/boris.107405
Date of Publication
December 21, 2017
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute

Universitätsklinik fü...

Contributor
Thiele, Holger
Akin, Ibrahim
Sandri, Marcus
Fuernau, Georg
de Waha, Suzanne
Meyer-Saraei, Roza
Nordbeck, Peter
Geisler, Tobias
Landmesser, Ulf
Skurk, Carsten
Fach, Andreas
Lapp, Harald
Piek, Jan J
Noc, Marko
Goslar, Tomaž
Felix, Stephan B
Maier, Lars S
Stepinska, Janina
Oldroyd, Keith
Serpytis, Pranas
Montalescot, Gilles
Barthelemy, Olivier
Huber, Kurt
Windecker, Stephan
Universitätsklinik für Kardiologie
Savonitto, Stefano
Torremante, Patrizia
Vrints, Christiaan
Schneider, Steffen
Desch, Steffen
Zeymer, Uwe
Subject(s)

600 - Technology::610...

Series
New England journal of medicine NEJM
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
0028-4793
Publisher
Massachusetts Medical Society MMS
Language
English
Publisher DOI
10.1056/NEJMoa1710261
PubMed ID
29083953
Description
Background In patients who have acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock, early revascularization of the culprit artery by means of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves outcomes. However, the majority of patients with cardiogenic shock have multivessel disease, and whether PCI should be performed immediately for stenoses in nonculprit arteries is controversial. Methods In this multicenter trial, we randomly assigned 706 patients who had multivessel disease, acute myocardial infarction, and cardiogenic shock to one of two initial revascularization strategies: either PCI of the culprit lesion only, with the option of staged revascularization of nonculprit lesions, or immediate multivessel PCI. The primary end point was a composite of death or severe renal failure leading to renal-replacement therapy within 30 days after randomization. Safety end points included bleeding and stroke. Results At 30 days, the composite primary end point of death or renal-replacement therapy had occurred in 158 of the 344 patients (45.9%) in the culprit-lesion-only PCI group and in 189 of the 341 patients (55.4%) in the multivessel PCI group (relative risk, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to 0.96; P=0.01). The relative risk of death in the culprit-lesion-only PCI group as compared with the multivessel PCI group was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.98; P=0.03), and the relative risk of renal-replacement therapy was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.49 to 1.03; P=0.07). The time to hemodynamic stabilization, the risk of catecholamine therapy and the duration of such therapy, the levels of troponin T and creatine kinase, and the rates of bleeding and stroke did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusions Among patients who had multivessel coronary artery disease and acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock, the 30-day risk of a composite of death or severe renal failure leading to renal-replacement therapy was lower among those who initially underwent PCI of the culprit lesion only than among those who underwent immediate multivessel PCI. (Funded by the European Union 7th Framework Program and others; CULPRIT-SHOCK ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01927549 .).
Handle
https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/155805
Show full item
File(s)
FileFile TypeFormatSizeLicensePublisher/Copright statementContent
NEJMoa1710261.pdftextAdobe PDF303.13 KBpublishedOpen
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 960e9e [21.08. 13:49]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo