• LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo

BORIS Portal

Bern Open Repository and Information System

  • Publications
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • LOGIN
    Login with username and password
Repository logo
Unibern.ch
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III non-inferiority trial (SAKK 41/06)
 

Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III non-inferiority trial (SAKK 41/06)

Options
  • Details
BORIS DOI
10.7892/boris.77225
Date of Publication
2015
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute

Universitätsklinik fü...

Contributor
Koeberle, D
Betticher, D C
von Moos, R
Dietrich, D
Brauchli, P
Baertschi, D
Matter, K
Winterhalder, R
Borner, M
Anchisi, S
Moosmann, P
Kollár, Attila
Universitätsklinik für Medizinische Onkologie
Saletti, P
Roth, A
Frueh, M
Kueng, M
Popescu, R A
Schacher, S
Hess, V
Herrmann, R
Subject(s)

600 - Technology::610...

Series
Annals of oncology
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
0923-7534
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Language
English
Publisher DOI
10.1093/annonc/mdv011
PubMed ID
25605741
Uncontrolled Keywords

bevacizumab

maintenance therapy

metastatic colorectal...

Description
BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy plus bevacizumab is a standard option for first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. We assessed whether no continuation is non-inferior to continuation of bevacizumab after completing first-line chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In an open-label, phase III multicentre trial, patients with mCRC without disease progression after 4-6 months of standard first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab were randomly assigned to continuing bevacizumab at a standard dose or no treatment. CT scans were done every 6 weeks until disease progression. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP). A non-inferiority limit for hazard ratio (HR) of 0.727 was chosen to detect a difference in TTP of 6 weeks or less, with a one-sided significance level of 10% and a statistical power of 85%.

RESULTS

The intention-to-treat population comprised 262 patients: median follow-up was 36.7 months. The median TTP was 4.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1-5.4] months for bevacizumab continuation versus 2.9 (95% CI 2.8-3.8) months for no continuation; HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.58-0.96). Non-inferiority could not be demonstrated. The median overall survival was 25.4 months for bevacizumab continuation versus 23.8 months (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.63-1.1; P = 0.2) for no continuation. Severe adverse events were uncommon in the bevacizumab continuation arm. Costs for bevacizumab continuation were estimated to be ∼30,000 USD per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-inferiority could not be demonstrated for treatment holidays versus continuing bevacizumab monotheray, after 4-6 months of standard first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Based on no impact on overall survival and increased treatment costs, bevacizumab as a single agent is of no meaningful therapeutic value. More efficient treatment approaches are needed to maintain control of stabilized disease following induction therapy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00544700.
Handle
https://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/139011
Show full item
File(s)
FileFile TypeFormatSizeLicensePublisher/Copright statementContent
709.full.pdftextAdobe PDF209.72 KBpublisherpublishedOpen
BORIS Portal
Bern Open Repository and Information System
Build: 27ad28 [15.10. 15:21]
Explore
  • Projects
  • Funding
  • Publications
  • Research Data
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
More
  • About BORIS Portal
  • Send Feedback
  • Cookie settings
  • Service Policy
Follow us on
  • Mastodon
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
UniBe logo