GetReal in network meta-analysis: a review of the methodology.
Options
BORIS DOI
Date of Publication
September 2016
Publication Type
Article
Division/Institute
Contributor
Efthimiou, Orestis | |
Debray, Thomas P A | |
van Valkenhoef, Gert | |
Panayidou, Klea | |
Moons, Karel G M | |
Reitsma, Johannes B | |
Shang, Aijing |
Series
Research Synthesis Methods
ISSN or ISBN (if monograph)
1759-2879
Publisher
Wiley
Language
English
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
26754852
Description
Pairwise meta-analysis is an established statistical tool for synthesizing evidence from multiple trials, but it is informative only about the relative efficacy of two specific interventions. The usefulness of pairwise meta-analysis is thus limited in real-life medical practice, where many competing interventions may be available for a certain condition and studies informing some of the pairwise comparisons may be lacking. This commonly encountered scenario has led to the development of network meta-analysis (NMA). In the last decade, several applications, methodological developments, and empirical studies in NMA have been published, and the area is thriving as its relevance to public health is increasingly recognized. This article presents a review of the relevant literature on NMA methodology aiming to pinpoint the developments that have appeared in the field. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
File(s)
| File | File Type | Format | Size | License | Publisher/Copright statement | Content | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efthimiou ResSynthMethods 2016.pdf | text | Adobe PDF | 451.55 KB | publisher | published | ||
| Efthimiou ResSynthMethods 2016_postprint.pdf | text | Adobe PDF | 415.75 KB | publisher | accepted |