Publication:
Voices of conference attendees: how should future hybrid conferences be designed?

cris.virtualsource.author-orcid0ab55995-80ca-400f-b065-8a590ad5b3da
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid0f13fcd1-a050-4dfd-84a9-75288280a9f3
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidb7a467aa-d0d9-4320-80ed-eda43a4f62c4
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorRam, Sai Sreenidhi
dc.contributor.authorStricker, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorPannetier, Carine
dc.contributor.authorTabin, Nathalie
dc.contributor.authorCostello, Richard W
dc.contributor.authorStolz, Daiana
dc.contributor.authorEva, Kevin W
dc.contributor.authorHuwendiek, Sören
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-26T17:51:47Z
dc.date.available2024-10-26T17:51:47Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-09
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND With conference attendees having expressed preference for hybrid meeting formats (containing both in-person and virtual components), organisers are challenged to find the best combination of events for academic meetings. Better understanding what attendees prioritise in a hybrid conference should allow better planning and need fulfilment. METHODS An online survey with closed and open-ended questions was distributed to registrants of an international virtual conference. Responses were then submitted to descriptive statistical analysis and directed content analysis. RESULTS 823 surveys (Response Rate = 4.9%) were received. Of the 813 who expressed a preference, 56.9% (N = 463) desired hybrid conference formats in the future, 32.0% (N = 260) preferred in-person conferences and 11.1% (N = 90) preferred virtual conferences. Presuming a hybrid meeting could be adopted, 67.4% (461/684) preferred that virtual sessions take place both during the in-person conference and be spread throughout the year. To optimise in-person components of hybrid conferences, recommendations received from 503 respondents included: prioritising clinical skills sessions (26.2%, N = 132), live international expert presentations and discussions (15.7%, N = 79) and interaction between delegates (13.5%, N = 68). To optimise virtual components, recommendations received from 486 respondents included: prioritising a live streaming platform with international experts' presentations and discussions (24.3%, N = 118), clinical case discussions (19.8%, N = 96) and clinical update sessions (10.1%, N = 49). CONCLUSIONS Attendees envision hybrid conferences in which organisers can enable the vital interaction between individuals during an in-person component (e.g., networking, viewing and improving clinical skills) while accessing virtual content at their convenience (e.g., online expert presentations with latest advancements, clinical case discussions and debates). Having accessible virtual sessions throughout the year, as well as live streaming during the in-person component of hybrid conferences, allows for opportunity to prolong learning beyond the conference days.
dc.description.sponsorshipInstitut für Medizinische Lehre, Assessment und Evaluation (AAE)
dc.description.sponsorshipInstitut für Medizinische Lehre, Assessment und Evaluation, Praktisches Assessment (CS)
dc.identifier.doi10.48350/195831
dc.identifier.pmid38594650
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1186/s12909-024-05351-z
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/176646
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.relation.ispartofBMC medical education
dc.relation.issn1472-6920
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BDBAE17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BE0DE17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.relation.schoolDCD5A442C3E5E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subjectHybrid conference In-person conference Virtual conference
dc.subject.ddc300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology::370 - Education
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.titleVoices of conference attendees: how should future hybrid conferences be designed?
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.issue393
oaire.citation.volume24
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut für Medizinische Lehre, Assessment und Evaluation (AAE)
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut für Medizinische Lehre, Assessment und Evaluation, Praktisches Assessment (CS)
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut für Medizinische Lehre, Assessment und Evaluation (AAE)
oairecerif.author.affiliation2Institut für Medizinische Lehre, Assessment und Evaluation, Forschung / Evaluation
oairecerif.author.affiliation2Institut für Medizinische Lehre, Assessment und Evaluation (AAE)
oairecerif.author.affiliation2Institut für Medizinische Lehre, Assessment und Evaluation (AAE)
oairecerif.author.affiliation3Institut für Medizinische Lehre (IML)
oairecerif.author.affiliation3Institut für Medizinische Lehre, Softwareentwicklung, Usability-Consulting und IT-Infrastruktur (ASC
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2024-04-11 02:15:19
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId195831
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleBMC MED EDUC
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
s12909-024-05351-z.pdf
Size:
984.7 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Content:
published

Collections