Publication:
Are positive psychology interventions efficacious in chronic pain treatment? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

cris.virtualsource.author-orcid1d8d7b83-b25b-468c-a646-e8edadd045d3
dc.contributor.authorBraunwalder, Céline
dc.contributor.authorMüller, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorGlisic, Marija
dc.contributor.authorFekete, Christine
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-02T17:42:26Z
dc.date.available2024-09-02T17:42:26Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-03
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE Although positive psychology interventions are increasingly popular in chronic pain treatment their efficacy is still unclear. The objective is to summarize evidence on the effect of positive psychology interventions (PPIs) on pain, physical functioning, and emotional functioning in adults with chronic pain. METHODS Four electronic databases and additional references were searched for randomized controlled trials published between 1990 and 2020. Findings from included studies were qualitatively and quantitatively synthesized, and study quality was assessed for risk of bias. A random effects meta-analysis model was applied for outcomes with more than four findings. RESULTS Of 16 included randomized controlled trials, almost half delivered positive psychology interventions as self-help online interventions, and half conducted guided face-to-face interventions which lasted mostly eight weeks. Results from meta-analysis showed beneficial effects of positive psychology interventions compared to the control group on pain intensity and emotional functioning (i.e., less depressive symptoms, pain catastrophizing, negative affect; more positive affect) post-intervention. At 3-month follow-up, beneficial effects were maintained for depressive symptoms and positive and negative affect, but not for pain catastrophizing. However, the evidence on the long-term efficacy of PPIs and the efficacy of PPIs on physical functioning remains limited. CONCLUSION This review supports the notion that positive psychology interventions are beneficial to chronic pain treatment, although further, high quality research is needed to support this conclusion.
dc.description.numberOfPages15
dc.description.sponsorshipInstitut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
dc.identifier.doi10.48350/158027
dc.identifier.pmid34347095
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1093/pm/pnab247
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/42927
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.ispartofPain medicine
dc.relation.issn1526-4637
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442BECFE17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subjectPositive psychology chronic pain meta-analysis randomized controlled trials systematic review
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.subject.ddc300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology::360 - Social problems & social services
dc.titleAre positive psychology interventions efficacious in chronic pain treatment? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage136
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.startPage122
oaire.citation.volume23
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.embargoChanged2022-08-05 22:25:02
unibe.date.licenseChanged2023-01-24 08:30:50
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId158027
unibe.journal.abbrevTitlePAIN MED
unibe.refereedTRUE
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Name:
Braunwalder_PainMed_2021_AAM.pdf
Size:
1.18 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License:
publisher
Content:
accepted
Name:
Braunwalder_PainMed_2022.pdf
Size:
534.59 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License:
publisher
Content:
published

Collections