Publication:
The International Tree-Ring Data Bank (ITRDB) revisited: Data availability and global ecological representativity

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-8170-6659
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid38fe96b3-20aa-4771-b631-2c54936185cf
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid4ebcf387-6ed1-4a5f-a74e-882a18a6f95c
datacite.rightsrestricted
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Shoudong
dc.contributor.authorPederson, Neil
dc.contributor.authorD'Orangeville, Loïc
dc.contributor.authorHilleRisLambers, Janneke
dc.contributor.authorBoose, Emery
dc.contributor.authorPenone, Caterina
dc.contributor.authorBauer, Bruce
dc.contributor.authorJiang, Yuan
dc.contributor.authorDelgado Manzanedo, Ruben
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-07T16:49:09Z
dc.date.available2024-10-07T16:49:09Z
dc.date.issued2019-02
dc.description.abstractAim: The International Tree‐Ring Data Bank (ITRDB) is the most comprehensive database of tree growth. To evaluate its usefulness and improve its accessibility to the broad scientific community, we aimed to: (a) quantify its biases, (b) assess how well it represents global forests, (c) develop tools to identify priority areas to improve its representativity, and d) make available the corrected database. Location: Worldwide. Time period: Contributed datasets between 1974 and 2017. Major taxa studied: Trees. Methods: We identified and corrected formatting issues in all individual datasets of the ITRDB. We then calculated the representativity of the ITRDB with respect to species, spatial coverage, climatic regions, elevations, need for data update, climatic limitations on growth, vascular plant diversity, and associated animal diversity. We combined these metrics into a global Priority Sampling Index (PSI) to highlight ways to improve ITRDB representativity. Results: Our refined dataset provides access to a network of >52 million growth data points worldwide. We found, however, that the database is dominated by trees from forests with low diversity, in semi‐arid climates, coniferous species, and in western North America. Conifers represented 81% of the ITRDB and even in well‐sampled areas, broadleaves were poorly represented. Our PSI stressed the need to increase the database diversity in terms of broadleaf species and identified poorly represented regions that require scientific attention. Great gains will be made by increasing research and data sharing in African, Asian, and South American forests. Main conclusions: The extensive data and coverage of the ITRDB show great promise to address macroecological questions. To achieve this, however, we have to overcome the significant gaps in the representativity of the ITRDB. A strategic and organized group effort is required, and we hope the tools and data provided here can guide the efforts to improve this invaluable database.
dc.description.numberOfPages14
dc.description.sponsorshipInstitut für Pflanzenwissenschaften (IPS)
dc.identifier.doi10.7892/boris.122689
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1111/jbi.13488
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/61652
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBlackwell Scientific Publications
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Biogeography
dc.relation.issn0305-0270
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442C301E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.relation.organizationDCD5A442C579E17DE0405C82790C4DE2
dc.subjectbias analysis
dc.subjectbig data
dc.subjectdata accessibility
dc.subjectdendrochronology
dc.subjectdendroecology
dc.subjectmeta-analysis
dc.subjecttreegrowth
dc.subjecttree-ring research
dc.subject.ddc500 - Science::580 - Plants (Botany)
dc.titleThe International Tree-Ring Data Bank (ITRDB) revisited: Data availability and global ecological representativity
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.endPage368
oaire.citation.issue2
oaire.citation.startPage355
oaire.citation.volume46
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut für Pflanzenwissenschaften (IPS)
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut für Pflanzenwissenschaften (IPS)
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2019-10-23 15:47:48
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId122689
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleJ BIOGEOGR
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
2019_JBiogeogr_46_355.pdf
Size:
3.4 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
publisher
Content:
published

Collections