Publication:
Two-phase survey on the frequency of use and safety of MRI for hearing implant recipients.

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0001-5392-2074
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidb8001a11-3074-41b5-8ecd-e476ec2b4ee1
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid4321533f-b33a-46e6-8d2c-98b0a85570fc
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorvan de Heyning, Paul
dc.contributor.authorMertens, Griet
dc.contributor.authorTopsakal, Vedat
dc.contributor.authorde Brito, Ruben
dc.contributor.authorWimmer, Wilhelm
dc.contributor.authorCaversaccio, Marco
dc.contributor.authorDazert, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorVolkenstein, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorZernotti, Mario
dc.contributor.authorParnes, Lorne S
dc.contributor.authorStaecker, Hinrich
dc.contributor.authorBruce, Iain A
dc.contributor.authorRajan, Gunesh
dc.contributor.authorAtlas, Marcus
dc.contributor.authorFriedland, Peter
dc.contributor.authorSkarzynski, Piotr H
dc.contributor.authorSugarova, Serafima
dc.contributor.authorKuzovkov, Vladislav
dc.contributor.authorHagr, Abdulrahman
dc.contributor.authorMlynski, Robert
dc.contributor.authorSchmutzhard, Joachim
dc.contributor.authorUsami, Shin-Ichi
dc.contributor.authorLassaletta, Luis
dc.contributor.authorGavilán, Javier
dc.contributor.authorGodey, Benoit
dc.contributor.authorRaine, Christopher H
dc.contributor.authorHagen, Rudolf
dc.contributor.authorSprinzl, Georg M
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorBaumgartner, Wolf-Dieter
dc.contributor.authorKarltorp, Eva
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-02T17:24:23Z
dc.date.available2024-09-02T17:24:23Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-31
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often used to visualize and diagnose soft tissues. Hearing implant (HI) recipients are likely to require at least one MRI scan during their lifetime. However, the MRI scanner can interact with the implant magnet, resulting in complications for the HI recipient. This survey, which was conducted in two phases, aimed to evaluate the safety and performance of MRI scans for individuals with a HI manufactured by MED-EL (MED-EL GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria). METHODS A survey was developed and distributed in two phases to HEARRING clinics to obtain information about the use of MRI for recipients of MED-EL devices. Phase 1 focused on how often MRI is used in diagnostic imaging of the head region of the cochlear implant (CI) recipients. Phase 2 collected safety information about MRI scans performed on HI recipients. RESULTS 106 of the 126 MRI scans reported in this survey were performed at a field strength of 1.5 T, on HI recipients who wore the SYNCHRONY CI or SYNCHRONY ABI. The head and spine were the most frequently imaged regions. 123 of the 126 scans were performed without any complications; two HI recipients experienced discomfort/pain. One recipient required reimplantation after an MRI was performed using a scanner that had not been approved for that implant. There was only one case that required surgical removal of the implant to reduce the imaging artefact. CONCLUSION Individuals with either a SYNCHRONY CI or SYNCHRONY ABI from MED-EL can safely undergo a 1.5 T MRI when it is performed according to the manufacturer's safety policies and procedures.
dc.description.numberOfPages9
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversitätsklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, Kopf- und Halschirurgie (HNOK)
dc.identifier.doi10.48350/155432
dc.identifier.pmid33788034
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1007/s00405-020-06525-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/41718
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology
dc.relation.issn0937-4477
dc.relation.organizationClinic of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders (ENT)
dc.relation.organizationARTORG Center - Hearing Research Laboratory
dc.subjectAuditory brainstem implant Bone conduction Cochlear implant Magnetic resonance imaging Middle ear implant Safety
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.titleTwo-phase survey on the frequency of use and safety of MRI for hearing implant recipients.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage4233
oaire.citation.issue11
oaire.citation.startPage4225
oaire.citation.volume278
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, Kopf- und Halschirurgie (HNOK)
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, Kopf- und Halschirurgie (HNOK)
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2021-04-28 16:32:52
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId155432
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleEUR ARCH OTO-RHINO-L
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
Van-de-heyning-2021-Two-phase-survey-on-the-frequency-o.pdf
Size:
461.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Content:
published

Collections