Perception of Dental and Smile Esthetics by Orthodontists and Prosthodontists: A Pilot Study.
Options
BORIS DOI
Publisher DOI
PubMed ID
38373056
Description
Purpose
To examine if there are differences in smile esthetic evaluation scores by orthodontists and prosthodontists and if there are changes in those scores when two evaluations are performed, when the time of observation is increased, and when the lips are present or absent from the images.Materials And Methods
In total, 12 individuals participated in this pilot study. Two digital images were taken from each individual. The first digital image was a smile view, and the second image was an intraoral view. Two presentation files were prepared, with two images for each individual. The smile and dental attractiveness ratings were obtained from 10 specialists.Results
Repeated measures ANOVA was applied including all four within-subject factors, the evaluator (E), the repetition (R), the time of observation (T), and the presence or not of lips (L). Factors E, T, and L each had a statistically significant main effect. E and R had a statistically significant combined effect. In particular, the esthetic score for the view with smile was overall higher than for the intraoral view. The same results were obtained when the analysis was repeated with the 10 evaluators grouped to prosthodontists and orthodontists, and the prosthodontists tended to score higher than the orthodontists.Conclusions
The evaluator and the presence of lips have a statistically significant effect. The present pilot study has found that three (E, L, R) out of four factors (T) are important for the evaluation of dental esthetics.
To examine if there are differences in smile esthetic evaluation scores by orthodontists and prosthodontists and if there are changes in those scores when two evaluations are performed, when the time of observation is increased, and when the lips are present or absent from the images.Materials And Methods
In total, 12 individuals participated in this pilot study. Two digital images were taken from each individual. The first digital image was a smile view, and the second image was an intraoral view. Two presentation files were prepared, with two images for each individual. The smile and dental attractiveness ratings were obtained from 10 specialists.Results
Repeated measures ANOVA was applied including all four within-subject factors, the evaluator (E), the repetition (R), the time of observation (T), and the presence or not of lips (L). Factors E, T, and L each had a statistically significant main effect. E and R had a statistically significant combined effect. In particular, the esthetic score for the view with smile was overall higher than for the intraoral view. The same results were obtained when the analysis was repeated with the 10 evaluators grouped to prosthodontists and orthodontists, and the prosthodontists tended to score higher than the orthodontists.Conclusions
The evaluator and the presence of lips have a statistically significant effect. The present pilot study has found that three (E, L, R) out of four factors (T) are important for the evaluation of dental esthetics.
Date of Publication
2024-06-21
Publication Type
Article
Subject(s)
Language(s)
en
Contributor(s)
Vasilaki, Dimitra | |
Sidira, Margarita | |
Kirmanidou, Yvoni | |
Vagropoulou, Georgia | |
Dimitris, Kugiumtzis | |
Argirios, Pissiotis | |
Michalakis, Konstantinos |
Series
The International journal of prosthodontics
Publisher
Quintessence Publishing Co.
ISSN
1942-4426
Access(Rights)
restricted