Publication:
ROB-MEN: a tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis.

cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-6196-3308
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-6630-6817
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0001-7462-5132
cris.virtual.author-orcid0000-0002-3830-8508
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid6f6211f9-cf14-4ddd-a666-6fc1c4bd1b5f
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid94cc1dd7-9dd1-48ee-9b3e-dce1c3c31412
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid0712a976-a58f-465b-b9e7-bda5a4f1a990
cris.virtualsource.author-orcid5c8247bd-3b6a-428b-a426-5f9725e9e9a4
cris.virtualsource.author-orcida47a659b-5a23-43fa-86e3-f9401108114c
cris.virtualsource.author-orcidade91a16-6e2b-4d1c-b538-15aac7c36747
datacite.rightsopen.access
dc.contributor.authorChiocchia, Virginia
dc.contributor.authorNikolakopoulou, Adriani
dc.contributor.authorHiggins, Julian P T
dc.contributor.authorPage, Matthew J
dc.contributor.authorPapakonstantinou, Theodoros
dc.contributor.authorCipriani, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorFurukawa, Toshi A
dc.contributor.authorSiontis, Georgios
dc.contributor.authorEgger, Matthias
dc.contributor.authorSalanti, Georgia
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-06T18:51:56Z
dc.date.available2024-10-06T18:51:56Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-23
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND Selective outcome reporting and publication bias threaten the validity of systematic reviews and meta-analyses and can affect clinical decision-making. A rigorous method to evaluate the impact of this bias on the results of network meta-analyses of interventions is lacking. We present a tool to assess the Risk Of Bias due to Missing Evidence in Network meta-analysis (ROB-MEN). METHODS ROB-MEN first evaluates the risk of bias due to missing evidence for each of the possible pairwise comparison that can be made between the interventions in the network. This step considers possible bias due to the presence of studies with unavailable results (within-study assessment of bias) and the potential for unpublished studies (across-study assessment of bias). The second step combines the judgements about the risk of bias due to missing evidence in pairwise comparisons with (i) the contribution of direct comparisons to the network meta-analysis estimates, (ii) possible small-study effects evaluated by network meta-regression, and (iii) any bias from unobserved comparisons. Then, a level of "low risk", "some concerns", or "high risk" for the bias due to missing evidence is assigned to each estimate, which is our tool's final output. RESULTS We describe the methodology of ROB-MEN step-by-step using an illustrative example from a published NMA of non-diagnostic modalities for the detection of coronary artery disease in patients with low risk acute coronary syndrome. We also report a full application of the tool on a larger and more complex published network of 18 drugs from head-to-head studies for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder. CONCLUSIONS ROB-MEN is the first tool for evaluating the risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis and applies to networks of all sizes and geometry. The use of ROB-MEN is facilitated by an R Shiny web application that produces the Pairwise Comparisons and ROB-MEN Table and is incorporated in the reporting bias domain of the CINeMA framework and software.
dc.description.numberOfPages13
dc.description.sponsorshipInstitut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversitätsklinik für Kardiologie
dc.identifier.doi10.48350/161720
dc.identifier.pmid34809639
dc.identifier.publisherDOI10.1186/s12916-021-02166-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://boris-portal.unibe.ch/handle/20.500.12422/57887
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.relation.ispartofBMC medicine
dc.relation.issn1741-7015
dc.relation.organizationInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine
dc.relation.organizationClinic of Cardiology
dc.relation.schoolGraduate School for Health Sciences (GHS)
dc.subjectEvidence synthesis Missing evidence Network meta-analysis Publication bias Reporting bias Risk of bias Selective outcome reporting
dc.subject.ddc600 - Technology::610 - Medicine & health
dc.subject.ddc300 - Social sciences, sociology & anthropology::360 - Social problems & social services
dc.titleROB-MEN: a tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis.
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.file.typetext
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.startPage304
oaire.citation.volume19
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
oairecerif.author.affiliationUniversitätsklinik für Kardiologie
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
oairecerif.author.affiliationInstitut für Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (ISPM)
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.contributor.rolecreator
unibe.date.licenseChanged2021-12-10 01:11:49
unibe.description.ispublishedpub
unibe.eprints.legacyId161720
unibe.journal.abbrevTitleBMC MED
unibe.refereedtrue
unibe.subtype.articlejournal

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
Chiocchia_BMCMed_2021.pdf
Size:
2.85 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
File Type:
text
License:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Content:
published

Collections